FBI Trump-hater Strozk to testify publicly

#104
#104
FBI Assistant Director Peter Strzok testified Thursday that former FBI Director James Comey directed him to focus his time and resources on the Russian election interference investigation over Hillary Clinton’s use of classified information.
 
#105
#105
Franklin Pierce said:
Strozk should have been FIRED a long time ago. How is it even possible that he continues to be employed with the FBI?
Click to expand...

Probably just so much easier to shuffle him off to the side than deal with Civil Service or whatever protections he has. Nobody may have even bothered to put warning/advisory letters in his file much less documented verbal or written reprimands as part of the multi-step warning process. So he got lateraled away on a "first" offense. Wonder what the deal is when one FBI agent lies to another one?
 
#108
#108
Franklin Pierce said:
Strozk should have been FIRED a long time ago. How is it even possible that he continues to be employed with the FBI?
Click to expand...

I believe his security clearance was revoked last month and he was “escorted” off the premises. I don’t know if he’s actually still working at his reassignment post in HR currently.

Regardless I would guess his days are numbered at the Bureau
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#109
#109
NorthDallas40 said:
I believe his security clearance was revoked last month and he was “escorted” off the premises. I don’t know if he’s actually still working at his reassignment post in HR currently.

Regardless I would guess his days are numbered at the Bureau
Click to expand...

Not to worry. He'll be a CNN contributor faster than $hit through a goose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#113
#113
“The texts between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, they are so damning,” Wolf Blitzer said on his show during a hearing recess.


“They are, Wolf,” CNN political director David Chalian agreed. “When he says that those texts, ‘not indicative of bias,’ that’s just flat wrong on it’s face. It is indicative of bias.”

“When you look at the language of those texts it’s very easy to point to a bias that this FBI agent was expressing,” Chalian added.
 
#114
#114
Franklin Pierce said:
“The texts between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, they are so damning,” Wolf Blitzer said on his show during a hearing recess.


“They are, Wolf,” CNN political director David Chalian agreed. “When he says that those texts, ‘not indicative of bias,’ that’s just flat wrong on it’s face. It is indicative of bias.”

“When you look at the language of those texts it’s very easy to point to a bias that this FBI agent was expressing,” Chalian added.
Click to expand...

I thought CNN was fake news??? Ohhh now this fits your narrative... gotcha
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#121
#121
Franklin Pierce said:
“The texts between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, they are so damning,” Wolf Blitzer said on his show during a hearing recess.


“They are, Wolf,” CNN political director David Chalian agreed. “When he says that those texts, ‘not indicative of bias,’ that’s just flat wrong on it’s face. It is indicative of bias.”

“When you look at the language of those texts it’s very easy to point to a bias that this FBI agent was expressing,” Chalian added.
Click to expand...




1) Of course they look bad. And those two should be fired for being idiots for putting that in writing.


2) Bias by the people working there does not translate into excusing Trump for what he did.


3) The people conducting the investigation of Trump, including in particular Mueller, have not been shown to be biased or to have acted in biased fashion. To the contrary, many Republicans say Mueller is not biased and would be professional throughout.


Have your fun, GOPers. At the end of the day, what matters is what Trump did. You, and he, cannot hide from the truth of that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#122
#122
Not one single person has been indicted for conspiracy/collusion with the Russians to influence American elections.

Yet the witch hunt, with corrupt investigators, goes on and on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#123
#123
lawgator1 said:
1) Of course they look bad. And those two should be fired for being idiots for putting that in writing.


2) Bias by the people working there does not translate into excusing Trump for what he did.


3) The people conducting the investigation of Trump, including in particular Mueller, have not been shown to be biased or to have acted in biased fashion. To the contrary, many Republicans say Mueller is not biased and would be professional throughout.


Have your fun, GOPers. At the end of the day, what matters is what Trump did. You, and he, cannot hide from the truth of that.
Click to expand...


Exactly what did he do?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#125
#125
lawgator1 said:
1) Of course they look bad. And those two should be fired for being idiots for putting that in writing.


2) Bias by the people working there does not translate into excusing Trump for what he did.


3) The people conducting the investigation of Trump, including in particular Mueller, have not been shown to be biased or to have acted in biased fashion. To the contrary, many Republicans say Mueller is not biased and would be professional throughout.


Have your fun, GOPers. At the end of the day, what matters is what Trump did. You, and he, cannot hide from the truth of that.
Click to expand...

You keep saying this as if you know something.....do tell....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top