evillawyer
Have No God Before His Orangeness
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 33,342
- Likes
- 21,834
Ok, so you're argument is there can't be anything amiss here because 14 months later Trump took strong actions against Russia. As if nothing happened during those 14 months that could have forced Trump's hand, right?
No, the issue is why did multiple Russian billionaires attend invitation-only inauguration events "typically reserved for top donors and close political allies." Now, there may be a perfectly reasonable explanation for that (maybe billionaires from all over the word were invited to attend; maybe these were friends of Trump who just happened to be Russian). But what doesn't explain it--and is completely irrelevant to that question--is what Obama did or did not do to combat Russian election interference. That's a deflection from the issue at hand.
I really think youre smarter than that and youre just trying to be supportive of Micks latest dumbass aha! point.
Federal court documents unsealed Wednesday reveal that former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort had much closer ties to a Russian oligarch linked to Vladimir Putin than had been previously disclosed.
A company jointly owned by Manafort and his wife received a $10 million loan in 2010 from the oligarch, Oleg Deripaska, according to the documents, which also alleged that the Russian billionaire provided financial backing for Manaforts consulting work in Ukraine as far back as 2005.
That information came from a source whose name was redacted in the documents, suggesting that one of Manaforts former associates has cooperated with special counsel Robert Muellers wide-ranging investigation into whether the Trump campaign coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election.
Mueller reveals closer Manafort ties to Russian oligarch - POLITICO
Mick was obviously making a joke, which I was laughing at because I saw the same issue as Mick did. Mueller's marching orders are not to "get Trump" but to investigate "any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and"--and this is the big one--"individuals associated with the campaign." That Gowdy is giving Rosenstein a hard time because he doesn't have anything specifically on Trump miscontrues what Mueller is supposed to be investigating.
those sanctions are not the only anti-Russia actions Trump has taken since taking office so the 14 months thing is a canard.
as for the Obama context the point is important since we know Obama's actions included ordering a stand down on retaliations once for Russian meddling opt instead to tell Putin to "cut it out". He threw on some sanctions as he went out the door.
some facts about what Trump has done and this list ignores his moves on LNG supplies to Europe
Byron York: Trump and Obama: Who's really tougher on Russia | Commentary | dothaneagle.com
WTF? The US and allies had 3 rounds of sanctions over Crimea in 2014.Russia intervened in Ukraine in 2014. Barry Hussein did nothing.
Obama didn't counter cyber attack Russia at a time when our Government agencies techniques and tactics were already in the hands of the very country that you want to wage this war with.
Are you suggesting that his decision not to wage this battle was wrong?
WTF? The US and allies had 3 rounds of sanctions over Crimea in 2014.
International sanctions during the Ukrainian crisis - Wikipedia
More than a year into Trumps presidency, however, none of the fears generated by his early statements on Russia have become a reality. If you strip away his ostensibly chummy personal relationship with Putin, Trumps Russia policy has been drastically more assertive than that of his predecessor. In 14 months, here is what his administration has done:
Not just me - many on his team are still pissed he resorted to "cut it out" instead of taking some action. Action plans were crafted, vetted and ready to go.
But this misses the larger point - it's just one example of minimum action on his part particularly compared to more action on Trump's part yet the mantra from you and EL is that Trump did nothing negative to Russia when the facts point in the exact opposite direction.
You are the one that highlighted the non cyber retaliation and downplayed the swift Obama sanctions against Russia. Get a better argument next time.
I find it comical that you now have so much faith in the intelligence agencies to properly investigate that those on your side have been bashing for the last year. Good stuff.
