Constitutional Atty, Mark Levin: Legal Precedent Is On Trump's Side

#26
#26
TennTom said:
Is this the same Mark Levin that blamed the Ebola crisis on Obama, claimed that the Muslim Brotherhood had infected our government, that Obamacare would bring death panels to the elderly and sick children, that was a devout "Never Trumper" until he wasn't, and who was caught in a 'pay for play' scam with his radio show? Anyone placing any credibility with this loon speaks volumes on those doing it.
Click to expand...

And evidently he's a constitutional law scholar now. haha
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#32
#32
Just because you don’t agree with him doesn’t make him an idiot. The guy has forgotten more about the Constitution than anyone here will ever know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 people
#34
#34
Jxn Vol said:
Just because you don’t agree with him doesn’t make him an idiot. The guy has forgotten more about the Constitution than anyone here will ever know.
Click to expand...

The guy is pro Trump. To the mouthbreathing libtards, that automatically means everything he says is invalid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#37
#37
Jxn Vol said:
Just because you don’t agree with him doesn’t make him an idiot. The guy has forgotten more about the Constitution than anyone here will ever know.
Click to expand...

Well said, and I don’t agree with Levin’s views in all cases. But in regards to this constitutional precedent, he’s right. Can’t win an argument against.
 
#40
#40
orangeluvr said:
You Faux"News" bots are vicious in your defense of the indefensible . Take micky "D' break with your burger king!
Click to expand...
FQWY.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#44
#44
Jxn Vol said:
I would argue that he is pro Constitution, but I understand what you are saying.
Click to expand...

He is pro-Constitution until it goes against his neocon preferences. He refused to debate Tom Woods (who knows way more about it than Levin) because he knew he'd get his azz handed to him. The best part was his lame excuse for not debating. He typically resorts to a name-caller when he gets shown up.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...FjAMegQIBxAB&usg=AOvVaw3chRZZiqsnsqOuT7vnkCov
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#47
#47
midnight orange said:
He is pro-Constitution until it goes against his neocon preferences. He refused to debate Tom Woods (who knows way more about it than Levin) because he knew he'd get his azz handed to him. The best part was his lame excuse for not debating. He typically resorts to a name-caller when he gets shown up.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...FjAMegQIBxAB&usg=AOvVaw3chRZZiqsnsqOuT7vnkCov
Click to expand...

You think Woods would disagree with Levin, pursuant to the thread topic precedent referenced in detail by Levin ?
 
Last edited:
#49
#49
OuterBanksVol said:
I see. So... Rosenstein's in on this coup, too? What's his motive?
Click to expand...

Still don't get the insider/outsider thing? Outsiders in power tend to threaten or change what the insiders have built for themselves. DC is of and works for insiders - not for Trump, and certainly not for the rest of us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#50
#50
BigOrangeTrain said:
You just proved my point. Thank you.
Click to expand...

Point is y'all are partisan to the bone and you'll defend anything tRump says or does no matter how reprehensible . Just wonder what he has done to deserve such undying loyalty, he's not loyal to anyone, proved it time and again.
Massive tax cuts for the oligarchs and super rich under the guise of "tax" reform and stripping away consumer protection regulations, meaningless EO are his accomplishments to date.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top