The Official 2nd Amendment Appreciation Thread

#5,727
#5,727
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
To me, a crime is an action against someone else’s person or property. Not the mere possession of something dangerous. Hell, life is dangerous.
Click to expand...
I agree but some things are inherently dangerous enough that they just don't belong in society. My neighbor is probably smart enough and possibly wealthy enough to build a mini nuclear reactor on his propety. I wouldn't be cool with that.
 
#5,728
#5,728
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
With all due respect, there shouldn’t be any kind of classifications. Either we have the right to arms or we don’t.
Click to expand...

I understand. And I do believe your interpretation is in fact in line directly with what the founding fathers intended. To be able to provide or meet, if required, force with equal force.
 
#5,729
#5,729
NorthDallas40 said:
I understand. And I do believe your interpretation is in fact in line directly with what the founding fathers intended. To be able to provide or meet, if required, force with equal force.
Click to expand...

Yep. To be able to overthrow a tyrannical government if the need should arise. That’s the foundation of the second amendment. Furthermore, it’s the foundation of a free humanity. Free people do not ask permission to be armed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5,730
#5,730
VolunteerHillbilly said:
I don't see how the bump stock can possibly be considered a safe consumer item. If you want full auto, pay up and do it legally.
Click to expand...

And that’s what makes it pointless, feel good government.

As has already been said, a “bump stock” just allows the gun to keep looking pretty...but I can accomplish the same thing with a shoelace, a dowel rod, etc.
 
#5,731
#5,731
NorthDallas40 said:
So I agree that while I don’t really care about an item I support other people’s right to own them generally.

But honestly this one item is a flyer that never should have been exempted from type II classification in my opinion. That’s just my opinion though and I do respect yours.

SBRs, silencers, etc... fully agree and fully support each persons right to own even though I don’t personally want one.
Click to expand...

Hey, I totally get silencers. If I want to shoot varmint in my backyard without the neighbors calling the cops then I should be able to do so.
 
#5,732
#5,732
This is where I correct my lax use of terminology and change “silencer” to “suppressor”. I noticed that when I saw your post Coug.

I will say though that the one I witnessed on a .22LR was silent. But not really a good round to reference from frankly.
 
#5,737
#5,737
Anyone else with a Taurus Millennium G2 getting wildly inconsistent target placement? I’m not the best shot in the world, but I swear something seems wrong with my G2. It’s almost as if the barrel isn’t sitting properly in the frame from one round to the next.
 
#5,738
#5,738
MG1968 said:
Anyone else with a Taurus Millennium G2 getting wildly inconsistent target placement? I’m not the best shot in the world, but I swear something seems wrong with my G2. It’s almost as if the barrel isn’t sitting properly in the frame from one round to the next.
Click to expand...

You tried opening your eyes while shooting?
 
#5,749
#5,749
MG1968 said:
Anyone else with a Taurus Millennium G2 getting wildly inconsistent target placement? I’m not the best shot in the world, but I swear something seems wrong with my G2. It’s almost as if the barrel isn’t sitting properly in the frame from one round to the next.
Click to expand...

Replace it with a shotgun, point it in the general direction, pull the trigger and there's no need to aim.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top