The official "Regular Posters of the Basketball Forum" Thread III

Status
Not open for further replies.
Have all of the FF posters now moved to the BB Forum? 0-8 FB and 25-8 BB will do that. I guess I'm glad that the basketball team has created interest, but there's a ****load of drive by fans posting who will vanish as soon as the trend is reversed. No doubt it's better than a dead board and a bad season.

I hate it too. Either stick around or don’t come to the BBall forum at all.
 
I hate it too. Either stick around or don’t come to the BBall forum at all.

I've tried to stay quiet and leave it alone... but we're getting a lot of regurgitated topic discussion. Lots of new threads for anything that's popping into some of the fellers minds. Mods are probably going nuts merging and moving. Again, I guess it's a good thing that there's so much interest. But I wish those that are going to disappear as soon as there's a loss would just leave now.
 
Actually I think that the wave of new drive by activity has crested. Of course it'll be back at high tide with every advancement to the next NCAAT round. Hopefully we crash the VN server in about two weeks.
 
So I did the math and every region has top four seeds adding up to 35 except the midwest, which is at 31 (Auburn, Duke, Mich St, Kansas).

Isn’t that weird? I though they were supposed to be close to equal?
 
So I did the math and every region has top four seeds adding up to 35 except the midwest, which is at 31 (Auburn, Duke, Mich St, Kansas).

Isn’t that weird? I though they were supposed to be close to equal?

It can’t possibly work out. They don’t say that because the public can’t grasp it.
 
I've tried to stay quiet and leave it alone... but we're getting a lot of regurgitated topic discussion. Lots of new threads for anything that's popping into some of the fellers minds. Mods are probably going nuts merging and moving. Again, I guess it's a good thing that there's so much interest. But I wish those that are going to disappear as soon as there's a loss would just leave now.

Yep, they don’t come around all year until we get a NCAA 3 seed and all of a sudden think they’re the first to come up with the same stuff we’ve been discussing all season.

I also love the confidence of some of these guys. Very sure of themselves when it comes to basketball knowledge. Unrightfully so, most of the time atleast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I'm lost. 35 or 31 what?

The overall seed placement, i.e. Virginia 1st seed overall, Nova 2nd, etc. If you add those up for the first four seeds in each region, they’re supposed to be basically the same, but the midwest is significantly lower than the other regions due to having MSU and Duke who are well ranked for their seed lines.
 
Yep, they don’t come around all year until we get a NCAA 3 seed and all of a sudden think they’re the first to come up with the same stuff we’ve been discussing all season.

I also love the confidence of some of these guys. Very sure of themselves when it comes to basketball knowledge. Unrightfully so, most of the time atleast.

We need some new poster profiles and star rankings. Surely there's some talent in there somewhere... just having trouble weeding out the clutter. You need to issue some grades.
 
The overall seed placement, i.e. Virginia 1st seed overall, Nova 2nd, etc. If you add those up for the first four seeds in each region, they’re supposed to be basically the same, but the midwest is significantly lower than the other regions due to having MSU and Duke who are well ranked for their seed lines.

Xzoh, I see. Could the play-in teams affect the math?
 
I'd gladly have SD back in exchange for a couple dozen that have suddenly shown up. SD was annoying at times, but also had high entertainment value.

It's actually not as bad as I first thought. There was just a huge spike in activity today. That's gonna happen after sitting out the NCAAT the last 3 years and 6 of the last 7.
 
It's actually not as bad as I first thought. There was just a huge spike in activity today. That's gonna happen after sitting out the NCAAT the last 3 years and 6 of the last 7.

Why weren’t you in the Bowden thread? Someone says something about Fulk and you go ballistic but people have been slamming Bowden all day and I’m the only one taking up for the kid.

Thought you would have his back as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Xzoh, I see. Could the play-in teams affect the math?

I was just doing it for the top four seeds from each region since they define the regions more than the lower teams, but I bet if I expanded it further it would be closer, yeah. I’m curious to see what golf thinks about it since he gets into the math on this stuff
 
Why weren’t you in the Bowden thread? Someone says something about Fulk and you go ballistic but people have been slamming Bowden all day and I’m the only one taking up for the kid.

Thought you would have his back as well.

I don't go ballistic. I'm opposed to ignorant blanket posts about Fulkerson sucking and is a waste of a scholarship.

Most of the Bowden criticism has been civil and reasonable. Even the critics can recognize that he's a pretty good defender. I agree.. he needs to shoot less until he's out of the slump.
 
I was just doing it for the top four seeds from each region since they define the regions more than the lower teams, but I bet if I expanded it further it would be closer, yeah. I’m curious to see what golf thinks about it since he gets into the math on this stuff

I think they rank them 1 through 68 and then move them around from the top down to get the highest seeds close to home. They might check it by doing the math but that wouldn't be the criteria driving it.

1+2+3+4+5+...+15+16 equals what? 128?
 
I don't go ballistic. I'm opposed to ignorant blanket posts about Fulkerson sucking and is a waste of a scholarship.

Most of the Bowden criticism has been civil and reasonable. Even the critics can recognize that he's a pretty good defender. I agree.. he needs to shoot less until he's out of the slump.

He took zero shots Saturday.
 
I don't go ballistic. I'm opposed to ignorant blanket posts about Fulkerson sucking and is a waste of a scholarship.

Most of the Bowden criticism has been civil and reasonable. Even the critics can recognize that he's a pretty good defender. I agree.. he needs to shoot less until he's out of the slump.

You obviously didn’t check the game thread.

People were saying he isn’t an offensive threat at all. He shouldn’t be getting any minutes, he’s just a warm body etc etc.

Someone says Fulk needs a haircut and you fly off the rails.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top