#BoycottNRA

No. Semi auto is FUNCTION not form. You know that.

As for it being your choice to fire a clip "as fast as you want", thats akin to saying you should be able to drive as fast as you want. There are rules and reasons why we don't drive 120 MPH.

False analogy. I NEED to be sure that I can save my own life or that of my family = my discretion on choice of firearm. I don’t NEED to drive 120mph in the name of safety for myself, family or anyone else on the road. Totally off the mark.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Nope. It's a dead on analogy... we institute driving rules to promote safety and reduce fatalities. Rules exist for a reason. You're welcome to violate them, of course.
So you’re cool with everyone shooting their guns in public, next to everyone, in front of schools, restaurants, interstates, every road, major crowded areas, just as long as they don’t exceed a specific rate of fire in a given area?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
So when someone goes in and shoots up a school using a six shooter, you coming after those too? I mean someone could have three or four tucked in his/her waist band and kill just as many if not more than thus guy. What about lever action rifles, same here. Tubular magazines and simple to reload. Easily could take down just as many. What about pump action shot guns? They could kill just as many. Easily reloaded on the go. Could kill more people than this guy. You coming for those too?

Bump for outerspacevol
 
Have you been watching the baizuo in this country?


They're all willfully ignorant, which is beyond basic stupidity. Stupidity I can forgive- shilling I will not.

We don't have a choice most of the time. The rest of the word laughs at them because they are weak low-t beta soy drinkers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Yes, I believe semi automatic guns should be banned. There is no civilian need for them. Assault style weapons, large mags and bump stocks gotta go. Americans will always have access to reasonable shotguns, rifles and handguns.
You are truly an idiot. I am guessing you really don't know what a semi automatic weapon is.


You utter the phrase 'semi automatic' and you jump straight to 'assault' and 'weapon of war' in that empty cranium of yours.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
So......do you agree with the interpretation of the Second Amendment that makes it illegal for him to buy a military assault weapon?

1) It's a limitation of the second amendment, not an interpretation.
2) I agree 18 yos should not be able to buy assault weapons. I don't own an assault weapon and I don't know anyone that does legally.
3) You, in feigned ignorance, are intermingling the terms Military Assault weapon, Assault weapon, Military Assault style weapon, Military style Assault weapon, and Assault style weapon. Only 2 of those are or were legal for an 18 yo to walk into a gun store and purchase legally. Please find a description and stick with it.
4) I would ask you to then agree with allowing those under 21 to buy the legal versions of the weapons described above with an honorable discharge from the military, in the military with a clean record or be 21 with no mil service.
5) Or simply consider also boosting the age of adulthood to 21 applying also to selective service and unlimited drivers licenses.

It is so ridiculous that in this country you can enlist at 18, go to Iraq, get your legs blown off, come home at 20 years old and be denied ANY right, much less the right to buy a beer or purchase a weapon that you know more about than most "gun nutz" and 99% of liberals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Nope. It's a dead on analogy... we institute driving rules to promote safety and reduce fatalities. Rules exist for a reason. You're welcome to violate them, of course.

"Welcome to violate."

Most don't mind it appears, when it comes to speed laws.

Sounds awesome. Do we expect the same opinions on gun law as we have on speed law?
 
Last edited:
You are truly an idiot. I am guessing you really don't know what a semi automatic weapon is.


You utter the phrase 'semi automatic' and you jump straight to 'assault' and 'weapon of war' in that empty cranium of yours.

He can't wrap his simple mind around it.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed
 
So when someone goes in and shoots up a school using a six shooter, you coming after those too? I mean someone could have three or four tucked in his/her waist band and kill just as many if not more than thus guy. What about lever action rifles, same here. Tubular magazines and simple to reload. Easily could take down just as many. What about pump action shot guns? They could kill just as many. Easily reloaded on the go. Could kill more people than this guy. You coming for those too?

I think the silence here is deafening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I think the silence here is deafening.

No, it's par for the course.

Leftism fails because it's always about taking something away from someone. Always.

Eventually leftists themselves are confronted with it so instead of dealing with it they run away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
No. Semi auto is FUNCTION not form. You know that.

As for it being your choice to fire a clip "as fast as you want", thats akin to saying you should be able to drive as fast as you want. There are rules and reasons why we don't drive 120 MPH.

Stupid post is just dumber than dumb it's so stupid. Really!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
What’s been danced around but not really pointed at directly for the gun ignorant is the “scary black rifle” is becoming the norm.

In shotguns look at the next one I want. The Beretta A400 Extreme. Helluva water foul gun which is exactly what it was designed for. Semi automatic action with synthetic stocks and integrated recoil system.

Even on the old school wooden deer rifle I have plenty of buddies taking their wooden stocks off and saving them and putting synthetic stocks on them. They are simply more durable and more economical than a high grade walnut stock.

The whole “stick with existing (which it already is outdated) hunting technology” argument is just another method to exclude modern normal firearms technology evolution and in my OPINION a dialog to fix us at the current firearms evolution point. And that is simply wrong.

And before the need crap comes back I don’t GAF what you think I need it’s none of your damn business. I am a law abiding citizen. Stop trying to legislatively make me a criminal. And any laws you attempt to pass for such reason will have no impact on criminal behavior since criminals don’t obey laws. Mind your own damn business. And no, my business is not your damn business.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
No, it's par for the course.

Leftism fails because it's always about taking something away from someone. Always.

Eventually leftists themselves are confronted with it so instead of dealing with it they run away.

At first he just claimed he wanted the "Weapons of War".
Then he claimed he just wanted "Assault Rifles".
Then he claimed he just wanted AR15s and other similarly styled guns.
Then he claimed he didn't want anything else just those.
Then he claimed he wanted all semi-automatic rifles.
The he claimed he wanted all semi-automatic weapons regardless of caliber, .22, shotguns, handguns.
But he said he wasn't for taking our guns away.

So I asked his about revolvers, lever action rifles, pump actions rifles/shotguns. Never got a response yet he claims he doesn't want all our guns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
Advertisement





Back
Top