#BoycottNRA

I used 'military assault rifle' specifically because I knew an 18 year old could not go in and buy that gun. It was intended to show that there are reasonable and rational laws that are already enforced that do not destroy the second amendment and deny you the right to own your guns. Some of you guys are so easily trapped it almost takes the fun out of the hunt.

No, I think you're talking out of your bung hole again and you realized how silly you looked so now you're throwing shade. You know little about laws, the constitution and firearms. You have no clue as to what makes one weapon different than the other. You're just like that TV station that misidentified a shotgun for an AR. Your knowledge of firearms comes from CNN.
 
No, I think you're talking out of your bung hole again and you realized how silly you looked so now you're throwing shade. You know little about laws, the constitution and firearms. You have no clue as to what makes one weapon different than the other. You're just like that TV station that misidentified a shotgun for an AR. Your knowledge of firearms comes from CNN.

Well, you're wrong. If nothing else, you guys are going to learn to be more critical readers and thinkers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
If republicans really wanted to make a dent in unnecessary deaths they would/could do the same.

Everyone acknowledges the trade offs between liberty, safety, security, and freedom. It is a line that will be debated until the end of time.

If you really want to make a dent in unnecessary desths, ban tobacco. They could have done it during the Clinton administration, but they made a bunch of lawyers rich instead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I'm guessing nobody.

BUT an 18 year old buying a military assault weapon with high capacity magazines may deprive many of those rights.

And you have yet to prevent that with a change in age or another law.

But let's hang our hat on a "may".
 
Advertisement





Back
Top