Clinton has her own thread and when you spew the "debunked dossier" I will ask what has been debunked in the dossier? Not verified does not mean proven false. keep that in mind. My speculation is team Trump had a lot to do with Russia and more and more evidence comes to light all the time proving that to be true. Russia is the string puller for Wikileaks and if you don't believe that then you would be wrong.
So you're going to continue to ride the "witch hunt" "fake dossier" train, you will be derailed by Mueller and evidence.
Trump Tower meeting happened and it wasn't on the up and up as you want to believe.
I don't want to believe anything - I'm going on what's been reported. You apparently want to believe it wasn't on the up and up but can provide no reporting to back up your belief.
At a minimum some claims of meetings have been debunked since the supposed person doing the meeting was not in Russia at the claimed time of said meetings.
What you haven't addressed
1) Steele sourced information directly from the Russian government
2) Clinton and the DNC paid Steele to do so.
At a minimum even if everything in the dossier were true Clinton received "something of value" from a foreign government to help in the election.
3) We know at least some of the information has been debunked.
4) We know some of the information is unverified (or at least through current testimony and reporting).
5) We know the dossier information was used in the investigation and the investigation was leaked to the public prior to the election.
6) We know that Clinton surrogates (Blumenthal and some one else I can't remember) fed Steele info for his second dossier (after the FBI dumped him) through the Obama State Department.
You lose all credibility when you fail to acknowledge the problems associated with the sourcing and use of the dossier.
