Mass shooting of the week, high school in parkland, FL.

#2,827
#2,827
OuterBanksVol said:
The only way that Florida will ban assault rifles is through a referendum. The people need to bypass Legislators.

NRA = Blood on your hands
Click to expand...

You’re such a dumbass.

So the last census data I found put adult gun ownership at 73 to 80 million people. The NRA membership estimates are around 5 million?

The NRA are an easy identifiable target. But they are only a small fraction statistically. They have a big voice. But far from the only voice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#2,829
#2,829
OuterBanksVol said:
Let's see... if I'm 300 pounds and want to lose weight I limit my food consumption right? Less food = less weight?

If I want less gun mass murders... and the weapon of choice are assault rifles, I do what...
Click to expand...

Go to Bass Pro and buy another one.
 
#2,830
#2,830
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
The only reason? I’d think the bill of rights would figure in there somewhere.
Click to expand...

Nope. Guess again. By that logic, I deserve the right to a bazooka.

Our founding fathers 2nd amendment was created in a time when you could shoot 2 to 3 rounds per minute. Most assuredly they would not approve of private citizens having weapons of war that fire several 100 rounds per minute.

It's common sense of course. But the NRA and gun toting idiots would like to think otherwise.
 
#2,831
#2,831
Squints said:
He’s not the one sitting in a safe space with his binky, coloring books and safety pin.

how-liberals-say-safe-space-how-conservatives-say-safe-space-6487954.png
Click to expand...

Sure he is, he's as soft as they come. He's not a conservative, nor is he a gun nut. He panders to the flavor of the day like the swamp creature he is.
 
#2,832
#2,832
NorthDallas40 said:
You’re such a dumbass.

So the last census data I found put adult gun ownership at 73 to 80 million people. The NRA membership estimates are around 5 million?

The NRA are an easy identifiable target. But they are only a small fraction statistically. They have a big voice. But far from the only voice.
Click to expand...

So why is it that every mass murderer uses in the AR15 or similar assault rifle?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,833
#2,833
OuterBanksVol said:
Let's see... if I'm 300 pounds and want to lose weight I limit my food consumption right? Less food = less weight?

If I want less gun mass murders... and the weapon of choice are assault rifles, I do what...
Click to expand...

The school was gun free zone how many people were shot?
Cities like Chicago and Baltimore are ran by far left people and guns are almost completely outlawed how many people were shot last year in those cities
 
#2,834
#2,834
OuterBanksVol said:
Nope. Guess again. By that logic, I deserve the right to a bazooka.

Our founding fathers 2nd amendment was created in a time when you could shoot 2 to 3 rounds per minute. Most assuredly they would not approve of private citizens having weapons of war that fire several 100 rounds per minute.

It's common sense of course. But the NRA and gun toting idiots would like to think otherwise.
Click to expand...

Are you PV reborn?
 
#2,836
#2,836
OuterBanksVol said:
Let's see... if I'm 300 pounds and want to lose weight I limit my food consumption right? Less food = less weight?

If I want less gun mass murders... and the weapon of choice are assault rifles, I do what...
Click to expand...

So since mass murders represent less than 1% of gun related homocides, the huge majority of which are committed by HANDGUNS, you obviously don’t give a **** about fixing homocides you just care about your gun agenda.

And you’re still using the wrong weapon description dumbass!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,838
#2,838
OuterBanksVol said:
I'm wise enough to recognize the only reason assault rifles are legal here is the NRA. How did the Florida children die?

Yep. Sorry. Truth hurts Bubba.
Click to expand...

Oh wise one with infinite knowledge. Please explain how a 19 year old with 39 visits from law enforcement in a year and being known by the FBI for having made threats to shoot up school was able to purchase a gun period.

I’ll wait Sissy.
 
#2,839
#2,839
NorthDallas40 said:
So since mass murders represent less than 1% of gun related homocides, the huge majority of which are committed by HANDGUNS, you obviously don’t give a **** about fixing homocides you just care about your gun agenda.

And you’re still using the wrong weapon description dumbass!!
Click to expand...

Your point is true. And you haven't heard me say a word about handguns have you. I'm opposed to weapons of war being in the hands of private citizens. It's at simple. An AR15 serves no purpose with a 100 round magazine and a bump stock other than killing a bunch of people. Our society needs to ban these things and needs to ban them now. If you don't like it tough ****. Common sense will prevail or be prevailed upon you.
 
#2,840
#2,840
OuterBanksVol said:
Your point is true. And you haven't heard me say a word about handguns have you. I'm opposed to weapons of war being in the hands of private citizens. It's at simple. An AR15 serves no purpose with a 100 round magazine and a bump stock other than killing a bunch of people. Our society needs to ban these things and needs to ban them now. If you don't like it tough ****. Common sense will prevail or be prevailed upon you.
Click to expand...
I don’t own a damn 100 round magazine they are heavy. I don’t own a damn bump stock they are stupid. Stop trying to label me and take my legally purchased property!!
 
#2,841
#2,841
NorthDallas40 said:
So since mass murders represent less than 1% of gun related homocides, the huge majority of which are committed by HANDGUNS, you obviously don’t give a **** about fixing homocides you just care about your gun agenda.

And you’re still using the wrong weapon description dumbass!!
Click to expand...

Trying to ban these “weapons of war” is just a start for these far left nut jobs they won’t stop there if successful
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,842
#2,842
luthervol said:
What would you have had the FBI do?
Click to expand...


The FBI was warned. They were given his name. They should have at least put him on a list so he couldn't buy guns. They should have searched to see if he had purchased guns already. This incident should have been stopped before it began.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,843
#2,843
OuterBanksVol said:
Nope. Guess again. By that logic, I deserve the right to a bazooka.

Our founding fathers 2nd amendment was created in a time when you could shoot 2 to 3 rounds per minute. Most assuredly they would not approve of private citizens having weapons of war that fire several 100 rounds per minute.

It's common sense of course. But the NRA and gun toting idiots would like to think otherwise.
Click to expand...

Look here, jackass, the second amendment doesn’t give us squat. It simply states a right we already had.

The whole point of the second amendment is to protect the average citizen against an oppressive government. It ain’t got squat to do with hunting or any other bs you want to come up with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#2,844
#2,844
OuterBanksVol said:
Nope. Guess again. By that logic, I deserve the right to a bazooka.

Our founding fathers 2nd amendment was created in a time when you could shoot 2 to 3 rounds per minute. Most assuredly they would not approve of private citizens having weapons of war that fire several 100 rounds per minute.

It's common sense of course. But the NRA and gun toting idiots would like to think otherwise.
Click to expand...

The whole founding fathers and x amount of bullets in x amount of time is such a dumb argument. Everyone had the same firearms in the 1700s just like today. All of you evolutionist should have been able to figure this one out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#2,846
#2,846
volfanjustin said:
Trying to ban these “weapons of war” is just a start for these far left nut jobs they won’t stop there if successful
Click to expand...

Yes. The slippery s**** theory is exactly what the NRA want you to believe. Disregard common sense just presume that reasonable rational people like me are going to try to eliminate all gun access to reasonable rational people like you. It's not gonna happen.

This is purely a scare tactic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,848
#2,848
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
Look here, jackass, the second amendment doesn’t give us squat. It simply states a right we already had.

The whole point of the second amendment is to protect the average citizen against an oppressive government. It ain’t got squat to do with hunting or any other bs you want to come up with.
Click to expand...

You need an AR15 for what precisely? Tell me what you need an AR15 with a bump stock and a 100 round magazine for?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top