Mass shooting of the week, high school in parkland, FL.

[NorthDallas40]

Like this .22 semi-auto azzault rifle!

Or this .22 semi-auto azzault rifle!!

 

[NorthDallas40]

It’s the end of gun control.

Ban 3D printers! The obvious logic to employ

 

[luthervol]

An F18.

Now are you going to be the liberal that answers my question about why diversity is 'better'.

Because the whole is always greater than the sum of its parts.

Question 2 for you. What is the least deadly weapon that should be illegal for a person to purchase?

 

[NorthDallas40]

Because the whole is always greater than the sum of its parts.

Question 2 for you. What is the least deadly weapon that should be illegal for a person to purchase?

A wet napkin

 

[luthervol]

I would love to hear your thoughts on 3D printed guns. How do you plan to stop that, Luther?

Reasonable laws and regulations with proper enforcement.

 

[DEFENDTHISHOUSE]

Reasonable laws and regulations with proper enforcement.

Good luck with that.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Good luck with that.

And you and I would submit we already have reasonable laws and would just like to see them enforced.

Case in point: FBI’s lack in response to this recent shooting as well as local sheriffs office as has been reported?

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Because the whole is always greater than the sum of its parts.

Question 2 for you. What is the least deadly weapon that should be illegal for a person to purchase?

Dental Floss

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Because the whole is always greater than the sum of its parts.

That is your OPINION, and there is zero objective evidence to prove that.

 

[Grand Vol]

You can't legally purchase a pipe bomb. You can make one out of everyday legal components. Not the same thing.

Please answer this question. It's amazing that I have asked twice and NO ONE will answer.

What is the most deadly WEAPON a person should legally be able to purchase?

I answered...

 

[Pepe_Silvia]

.

 

[The_411]

Actually I would submit your blaming of an inanimate object with no will, intent, or self awareness is the absolute most moronic idiotic statement that can be made in situations like this. Just like I always do when events like this happen and that stupid argument is brought out.

You will never disarm criminals or people with ill intent. That horse left the barn a long time ago. Closing that door now is a waste of time.

Let’s enforce the gun laws we have on the books before we throw them out and rewrite them.

So how is it that Australia was able to disarm and they haven’t a mass shooting in 22 years?

 

[golfballs]

Like this .22 semi-auto azzault rifle!

Scary!

 

[SLICKYINC]

So how is it that Australia was able to disarm and they haven’t a mass shooting in 22 years?

Oh no now we have Australia influencing our thoughts on gun laws. They say Russia just did that somehow.

 

[NorthDallas40]

So how is it that Australia was able to disarm and they haven’t a mass shooting in 22 years?

Not being snide but pan back a few pages on the Australia debate. It already came up as it normally does in these debates.

 

[davethevol]

Oh no now we have Australia influencing our thoughts on gun laws. They say Russia just did that somehow.

I’m surprised he didn’t use Cuba as his example. That’s the communist utopia these libs strive for.

 

[DancingOutlaw]

But let’s establish gun free zones because people intent on mass murder will follow the law. Utterly ridiculous.

Unfortunately we’ll never know how many shooters have been stopped by gun free zone signs.

 

[The_411]

Everyone wants to use Australia as the gold standard for gun control. The actions taken in Australia have been effective and have decreased the amount of gun violence which is going to be inherent if you ban certain types of guns and exterminate guns. This is good Australia has effectively eliminated mass murders due to guns. The problem is that all they were able to eliminate within the first 7 years. Within the first 7 years the homicide rate in Australia either grew, was the same or was just less than the rate in 1996. One would expect that you take away the guns that you would see an instantaneous drop in homicides because you have taken away the most potent weapon of destruction in society. What they saw actually was an increase in homicides in 1997 and 1999. So we eliminated the weapon of destruction so why didn't it decrease? What Australia failed to see is that even though they had the massacre in 1996 gun deaths were by a significant margin the second leading cause of homicides to knives and blades. After the gun bans homicides due to knives and blades in Australia increased.

So all they did is take the homicidal bean and moved it to another column and called it progress because the original column was decreased. If we enact something like this what we will find out is that killers are going to kill no matter what the method is. That kid had deep rooted anger to the point that he was going to kill if it wasn't a gun it was going to be homemade bomb, knife, or any other weapon.

The real questions now are:

1.) How can we better equip schools to identify kids who could be going down this path? What counseling techniques can they provide to help the kid? This kid was disturbed to the point where other kids were saying that if there was anyone to shoot up a school it would be him. How in the world could this be true and not one single teacher identified it and intervened?!

2.) In the interim until we find a solution to number 1 how do we better protect schools. Do we need to equip schools with metal detectors, cameras and locks to where everyone who enters is screened beforehand? This kid was seen as a threat when he was in the school to the point where he couldn't be on campus with a backpack and he was able to just enter the school unnoticed and fade into the crowd? They have video cameras inside the school that the authorities used to capture him with. How was someone not monitoring the camera feeds?

3.) What changes do we make in the FBI to make sure all threats are properly investigated? The excuse I heard from the FBI is that they were unable to trace his post on YouTube back to the original sender. If you can not do that how in the world are you tracking down Russia's supposed cyber threats to the US? Get off your dang vandetta in trying to uncover crap on politicians that may not be there and keep our citizens safe!

Sorry for the long post but this is so frustrating that we can't get our heads out of our behinds to get past the political nonsense and start getting to the real reasons why these keep on happening.

Clearly, we need to line school walls with trebuchets, ballistas, hot oil, and archers while placing a moat around the schools.

The political nonsense exists because we live in an oligopoly disguised as democracy.

If you’re a hunter and you use anything with a magazine you should be ashamed of yourself. It’s down right pathetic.

 

[luthervol]

Good luck with that.

It aint easy....especially considering the constant roadblocks put up by the NRA crazies.

 

[luthervol]

And you and I would submit we already have reasonable laws and would just like to see them enforced.

Case in point: FBI’s lack in response to this recent shooting as well as local sheriffs office as has been reported?

What would you have had the FBI do?

 

[NorthDallas40]

What would you have had the FBI do?

You don think the FBI could have followed up when they were contacted twice about this individual with the latest being on Jan 5?

 

[TheDeeble]

I had to take a test. I had to get a license. I have to pay insurance.

Make getting an assault weapon that difficult. Who has a problem with that?

You have to do all those things to take the car on public roads.

Sounds similar to laws already in place. You don't need to take a test, get a license or pay insurance on a vehicle that you don't intent to drive on public roads. You can buy whatever car you want and have your 6 year old drive around the field all day.

So what you're really saying is you think we should be able to buy firearms with no tests or licenses that we do not plan to carry in public.

 

[luthervol]

Dental Floss

Nice....Dental floss should be illegal?

The basic intent of my line of questioning is this....

What is the most deadly weapon that should be legal and what is the least deadly weapon that should be illegal?

Or in an easier to understand format,,,Between which two weapons would you draw the line separating legal from illegal and why?

 

[NorthDallas40]

Nice....Dental floss should be illegal?

The basic intent of my line of questioning is this....

What is the most deadly weapon that should be legal and what is the least deadly weapon that should be illegal?

Or in an easier to understand format,,,Between which two weapons would you draw the line separating legal from illegal and why?

Luther which of these two weapons is more lethal and why?

 

[NorthDallas40]

Lol dammit. Ok this is the other one.