NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 59,391
- Likes
- 86,672
Seems like more gun...and really more to the issue...more bullets at one's fingertips than an experienced rifle person might need to get the job done.
We certainly see the damage it can cause in a school.
Happy Hunting I guess.
what most people are eluding to in this dialog with you is the last time your points were put into play we got the federal assault weapons ban of 1994 which most firearms enthusiasts believe solved absolutely nothing yet access to certain types of weapons and weapon accessories was needlessly removed. I think it was viewed as punishing the instrument and not the user.
Thus when you bring this kind of rhetoric up again you will quickly fall on deaf ears. Weve done that. We said it wouldnt work. And it didnt.

Not entirely accurate. An old urban legend of the "wound rather than kill" theory.
Homemade pipe bombs.
An F18.You can't legally purchase a pipe bomb. You can make one out of everyday legal components. Not the same thing.
Please answer this question. It's amazing that I have asked twice and NO ONE will answer.
What is the most deadly WEAPON a person should legally be able to purchase?
You can't legally purchase a pipe bomb you moron. You can make one out of everyday legal components. Not the same thing.
Please answer this question. It's amazing that I have asked twice and NO ONE will answer.
What is the most deadly WEAPON a person should legally be able to purchase?
My question is this....
What is the most deadly and destructive weapon that this guy should have been able to easily and legally purchase? I'm curious what the answers will be.
I had to take a test. I had to get a license. I have to pay insurance.
Make getting an assault weapon that difficult. Who has a problem with that?
Look, in a previous line of work, I had to be bonded to carry the standard issue Glock...
An 18 year old should not be able to go into a gun shop and buy an assault weapon, most law enforcement folks agree.
It's just common sense.
A flame thrower, and they're perfectly legal in many places to buy and own. Cost about as much as an AR, and are quite compact if you buy the right model. Most spray fiery death at least 50 feet. The causality rate with one of these would be much higher and more gruesome than with anything else that can be legally purchased.
The term assault rifle has been co-opted from the original intended meaning by the gun control crowd as well as the media to describe any number of weapons in existence today.
Basically, it sounds way more scary when you call an auto loading rifle an "assault" rifle than just calling it a "semi-automatic rifle" like it truly is. Or pull in the next common term "weapon of war."
Why active shooter drills didnt help in the Florida high school shooting
Why active shooter drills didnt help in the Florida high school shooting
But no training program is effective enough to guarantee another attack like the one in Parkland, Fla., won't happen again, said Joseph A. LaSorsa, a former Secret Service agent and the CEO of the LaSorsa & Associates security firm.
When confronted by a heavily armed, determined shooter, "unless you're operating a Fort Knox, unless you have a military base and even then the checkpoints are vulnerable there's not much you're going to do," LaSorsa said.
"People who are hell bent on doing this, they're going to find a way," he said.
You can't legally purchase a pipe bomb. You can make one out of everyday legal components. Not the same thing.
Please answer this question. It's amazing that I have asked twice and NO ONE will answer.
What is the most deadly WEAPON a person should legally be able to purchase?
