Mass shooting of the week, high school in parkland, FL.

#2,776
#2,776
Septic said:
Honestly, these kids down here are pissed off something fierce. I don't think trump is going to placate them by tossing out the sacrificial bump stock lamb.
Click to expand...

A large majority of those kids are just like luther, too, only 40 years younger.

Ignorance and emotion lend no credence to their voices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#2,777
#2,777
Squints said:
A large majority of those kids are just like luther, too, only 40 years younger.

Ignorance and emotion lend no credence to their voices.
Click to expand...

Uh oh, kids are pissed. Let's set national policy or strip people of their rights because kids are pissed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#2,779
#2,779
Septic said:
Honestly, these kids down here are pissed off something fierce. I don't think trump is going to placate them by tossing out the sacrificial bump stock lamb.
Click to expand...

If Trump is a terrible president because he has no experience, why should policy be dictated by kids with no experience?
 
#2,782
#2,782
Grand Vol said:
By all means. Find out how much he donated into the Colorado recall elections about six years ago. Specifically in a state he doesn't even reside in.

Here's a good start:

Michael Bloomberg Donates $350,000 To Colorado Democrats Facing Recall Over Gun Vote | HuffPost

And more:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/abramb...d-50-million-to-fight-the-n-r-a/#d345f396330a

Gun control group vows $25M to fight ‘concealed carry’ - POLITICO

His group:

Lobbying Spending Database - Everytown for Gun Safety, 2017 | OpenSecrets

So on and so forth.
Click to expand...

Sensational headlines, so what are the totals? Bloomberg vs. NRA?
 
#2,783
#2,783
DancingOutlaw said:
If Trump is a terrible president because he has no experience, why should policy be dictated by kids with no experience?
Click to expand...

Hell, they can’t even vote. Remove the ignorance, inexperience, and even downright stupidity, these kids have no legal voice (talking about voting, nutbags) in this country!
 
#2,785
#2,785
golfballs said:
If the strength of your argument relies on the identity of the messenger, then maybe it's not that strong of an idea.
Click to expand...

Underestimating your opponent is a fools errand.

These kids are the future, things are changing - mock them at your own peril.
 
#2,787
#2,787
Squints said:
Hell, they can’t even vote. Remove the ignorance, inexperience, and even downright stupidity, these kids have no legal voice (talking about voting, nutbags) in this country!
Click to expand...

I'm beginning to think Luther might be on to something in regards raising the age to buy any gun to 21. But lets also raise the voting age to coincide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,790
#2,790
luthervol said:
Policy will not be dictated by these kids; however, policy "may" be dictated by the groundswell started by these kids.
Click to expand...

The views of half or more of these kids will change by the time they are 30 and can exert any influence. So I'm not worried.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,791
#2,791
Septic said:
Underestimating your opponent is a fools errand.

These kids are the future, things are changing - mock them at your own peril.
Click to expand...

You missed the entire point of my post. I'm not mocking them. I'm mocking people who demand we take their ideas seriously simply because of who they are. Just more identity politics from the left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,794
#2,794
hog88 said:
The views of half or more of these kids will change by the time they are 30 and can exert any influence. So I'm not worried.
Click to expand...

I'm thinking in more of the 8 month range. Maybe it amounts to nothing. We'll soon see.
 
#2,799
#2,799
luthervol said:
Simple yes or no will suffice.

Is the outlawing of bump stocks stripping people of their rights?
Click to expand...

Technically yes, but most "reasonable" people don't have a problem if they go away. See how that works Loo.

Edit: But if we the people could vote on every single law or regulation introduced. I would vote against banning them.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,800
#2,800
Grand Vol said:
He does like playing the devil's advocate any time he can
Click to expand...

A good debater can debate either side. It’s about the topic and talking points. A good debater can win with a bad talking stance against a bad debater

But I’m not gonna call Septic a good debater just because he likes to play Devils Advocate. 😬
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top