Precislet my point. These guns have no purpose in our society outside of the military.
What is your point? That rifles should be banned? AR-15s are
NOT assault rifles. Period. Neither are they classified as machine-class/fully-automatic.
Once you reconcile that, rearrange your argument and try again. If you want to talk retrofitting and bumpstocks, lets talk about it. Im entirely for eliminating bumpstocks and the capability of just anyone being able to make weapons automatic, fully or otherwise. Get rid of these components today, and Id have no argument at all.
I have yet to see an acceptable answer to my concerns, and Id like to hear your thoughts. This is where Im at and where I believe the attention needs to be focused:
-Mental illness
-Media coverage
-Cultural/societal indoctrination
-LEO/FBI inaction
We often hear of the FBI having been aware, or at least having a blip on their radar, after these horrific events take place. Why? Why are they reluctant to take these threats serious, other than after its too late?
Why does the media perpetuate coverage, only to instill deep-seeded mania in someone else (Im talking about attention seekers, manic depressives, sociopaths, psychopaths, etc.). At times, all that is needed is a trigger, and the media provides a perfect segue for this.
Cultural/societal components, in my opinion, are the most difficult to influence and control, but it needs correcting. Much like ISIS and other terror groups, their allegiance to an ideaology is greater than any warfare can defeat. Yes, we can wipe any terror group off the map, like ISIS, Al Qaeda, and others, but the ideaology doesnt disappear. In the months/years following, another group is in the process of building an empire. Much like with school shootings, how do we influence cultural/ideaological change, and prevent this from occurring?
Mental illness is another can of worms in and of itself. If an individual has documented medical diagnoses of mental disorders and/or medication to control such conditions, our system for legal purchase should evaluate this in determining suitability for ownership. Then, we get into issues with disclosing medical records/conditions, discrimination, etc. It is doable, but the legal hurdles would be formidable.