To Protect and to Serve II

#4,126
#4,126
Carl Pickens said:
What responsibility does the dumbass woman have in all of this?
Click to expand...

She has some, but not really what I'm asking.

I'm asking if LEOs would have more freedom in a situation like this than a security guard. I was mainly wondering that because Grand had went out of his way to try to make that distinction. I haven't gotten an answer yet.
 
#4,127
#4,127
Detroit police brawl after ‘embarrassing’ raid of drug house filled with undercover officers

Police from the department’s 11th precinct had planned to conduct the raid of house in their region on Nov. 8 that was suspected of being used to sell drugs.
Unaware of an undercover operation carried out in the home by 12th precinct cops, the armed officers conducting the raid moved in.
The uniformed officers confronted a pair of men a few doors down from the home at the centre of the raid. Those men, who were actually undercover police from the 12th precinct, were forced to the ground and a shotgun was pointed at them.

We need protection from cops. All that money and resources wasted because the cops are going around chasing their tail. They pretend to be drug dealers and 13 year olds but I just wish they would pretend to be adults and law abiding citizens.
 
#4,128
#4,128
Mick said:
Detroit police brawl after ‘embarrassing’ raid of drug house filled with undercover officers

Police from the department’s 11th precinct had planned to conduct the raid of house in their region on Nov. 8 that was suspected of being used to sell drugs.
Unaware of an undercover operation carried out in the home by 12th precinct cops, the armed officers conducting the raid moved in.
The uniformed officers confronted a pair of men a few doors down from the home at the centre of the raid. Those men, who were actually undercover police from the 12th precinct, were forced to the ground and a shotgun was pointed at them.

We need protection from cops. All that money and resources wasted because the cops are going around chasing their tail. They pretend to be drug dealers and 13 year olds but I just wish they would pretend to be adults and law abiding citizens.
Click to expand...
Why would cops be operating out of their precinct? Sounds a little fishy.
 
#4,130
#4,130
Carl Pickens said:
What responsibility does the dumbass woman have in all of this?
Click to expand...

Same tired **** over and over again. All you have to do is read a page or 2 and you'll see this point has been made and addressed multiple times.

Edit: for hell's sake, you already made this point on this page and people have addressed it, you deflecting broken record.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#4,131
#4,131
n_huffhines said:
Same tired **** over and over again. All you have to do is read a page or 2 and you'll see this point has been made and addressed multiple times.

Edit: for hell's sake, you already made this point on this page and people have addressed it, you deflecting broken record.
Click to expand...

I hope your hemorrhoids come back you pissy beeotch
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4,136
#4,136
Rasputin_Vol said:
Is that based on this being a policeman or a security guard? Or does it matter?
Click to expand...

Wouldn't matter. Guy is there to remove an obviously drunk/disorderly woman. If she had been cooperative, she'd have just been escorted out, intead, they had to carry her out and proceeds to hit the guard/officer.

His response was over the top but still legal, but I'd say he will still have to face some civil consequences and may ultimately lose his job...I dunno, just a guess.

Drunks are my least favorite people to deal with and takes tact and patience. They're the first ones to want to pick a fight, won't listen to reason and don't know when to shut the hell up. Loosing your temper is easy to do, maintaining your professionalism is hard, but necessary.
 
#4,137
#4,137
orangeblood79 said:
Wouldn't matter. Guy is there to remove an obviously drunk/disorderly woman. If she had been cooperative, she'd have just been escorted out, intead, they had to carry her out and proceeds to hit the guard/officer.

His response was over the top but still legal, but I'd say he will still have to face some civil consequences and may ultimately lose his job...I dunno, just a guess.

Drunks are my least favorite people to deal with and takes tact and patience. They're the first ones to want to pick a fight, won't listen to reason and don't know when to shut the hell up. Loosing your temper is easy to do, maintaining your professionalism is hard, but necessary.
Click to expand...

I didn't think it really mattered, either. I was just curious why a distinction was being made.
 
#4,139
#4,139
orangeblood79 said:
Wouldn't matter. Guy is there to remove an obviously drunk/disorderly woman. If she had been cooperative, she'd have just been escorted out, intead, they had to carry her out and proceeds to hit the guard/officer.

His response was over the top but still legal, but I'd say he will still have to face some civil consequences and may ultimately lose his job...I dunno, just a guess.

Drunks are my least favorite people to deal with and takes tact and patience. They're the first ones to want to pick a fight, won't listen to reason and don't know when to shut the hell up. Loosing your temper is easy to do, maintaining your professionalism is hard, but necessary.
Click to expand...
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FboxxQaBBDo[/youtube]
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4,141
#4,141
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#4,142
#4,142
#4,144
#4,144
hndog609 said:
That was written by someone that seemed pretty biased but if incriminating evidence was in fact kept from the jury as described that's not on the jurors.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure they saw it, just weren't allowed to see it in opening statements.
 
#4,145
#4,145
Cdywolfe said:
Pretty sure they saw it, just weren't allowed to see it in opening statements.
Click to expand...

I saw that in the first part but later was unsure the way that was written what was/wasn't fully shown later.

I can say with an extremely high degree of confidence that if as a civilian I was involved in a questionable shooting and "You're F****d" was etched onto my weapon it would have come up in court.

I think it very likely a civil suit is brewing as we speak, probably a big one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4,147
#4,147
He was drunk and couldn’t obey commands. Kept reaching back and they kept warning him until giving him a final ultimatum. Bad situation
 
#4,149
#4,149
So apparently the jurors didn't get to see the video. How in the hell, when trying a murder case, does a video of the murder not get shown to the jury?

Must be nice to have different judicial system than the rest of us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#4,150
#4,150
Big Gucci Sosa said:
He was drunk and couldn’t obey commands. Kept reaching back and they kept warning him until giving him a final ultimatum. Bad situation
Click to expand...

Yeah, telling a guy to crawl isn't really protocol as I understand it. There is no indication as to why they couldn't just walk up and handcuff the guy while he lay on the ground.

The judge ruled this prejudicial so it couldn't be revealed in court, but the shooter has "you're ****ed" etched on his rifle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top