So Sandusky had many many accusers and the first incident happened in 1998 and Greg Schiano left Penn state in 1995.....................
What an awful thing we did today. Just shameful.
You nailed it in your original rant back in January. Currie was the Haslams' man from the start. And he was hired specifically to hire Greg Schiano per the wishes of Jimmy Haslam.
This all does beg the question with AM and others still open is who now?
Venables?
Tee?
We were down to Schiano apparently so we must need to go even further down the list
Sorry for buying the Grumors and pushing it so hard here guys. My bad. All of this sucks. Still cant believe what has unfolded today. Hopefully it works out in the end.
:hi:
Sorry for buying the Grumors and pushing it so hard here guys. My bad. All of this sucks. Still cant believe what has unfolded today. Hopefully it works out in the end.
:hi:
Do some more research and check back in. The evidence was he said/she said but it was presnted he had knowledge.
I dont think it was ever a possibility for one reason. I think Currie/haslam had their guy from day one, I have no inside knowledge of that, just seems that Currie never had any plans to conduct a search.
It was a rumor he had heard from another guy who said he heard a rumor Schiano might have known something. DA investigated and found no credible information to move forward.
The incidents, like Bruin said, were years after Schiano was a coach at Penn State.
None of that is reasonable to believe he covered anything up or had knowledge of anything at all.
Im not trying to get in a fight with anyone or try and say we should have hired him because we shouldnt have. Twitter mob mentality just irks me and I dont like it one bit.