volinbama256
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2010
- Messages
- 12,664
- Likes
- 12,675
Interested to see opinions on this topic and I invite discussion.
For the record, I am 100% against a Schiano hire. I think the AD has really failed to do their due diligence in all this hire.
Having said that...
I think most of this reaction is emotionally rooted in the fact that Schiano is a huge miss from a football standpoint. People are just mad that we are about to hire another crappy coach, so we latch on to whatever we can.
To my knowledge, Mike McQueary claimed to have heard second hand that Schiano witnessed some lude behavior from Sandusky. That is hardly "evidence" and not very damning.
I think it would have been enough to keep me from hiring the guy, but we seem to have a lot of people convinced that Schiano is guilty of something and I believe that is a stretch.
Okay so we were told money is no object and there are 5-6 higher tier coaches out there and we either missed on ALL of them or Currie didn't really try to get ANY of them. Several coaches expressed interest and we said no thanks and turned Kelly away because of concerns, but think Schiano is clean and the perfect hire? Uh NO. This is the problem.