therickbol
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2005
- Messages
- 11,312
- Likes
- 15,807
Lol...do you even know the whole story? No. Once again, it was simply Davenports string being pulled by someone above her, who didnt want DB due to some kind of vendetta.
I don't know the entire story but I do know the man isn't an acting AD now. That is an enormous red flag and very glad we avoided that.
I mean it is his opinion
but it is an idiotic one
The reason he's not an acting AD is because Haslem wanted him gone. DB did himself no favors by the way he handled things. He's not an AD at UTC because of politics not because of job performance. He shouldn't have went off like he did but I can understand why he did. I not posting how he was treated (Phil too btw) but it was very degrading and disrespectful.
Dan Mullen would be at least a B+ hire. I can't think of a box he doesn't check:
- Has been positional coach for both a #1 pick and a heisman trophy winner
- Has two national titles as an OC
- Has 9 seasons of HC experience in the tougher division of our league
- Sustained success at a lesser program
- Has been recruiting in the south for well over a decade
- is only 45
- Known for running a dynamic offense and having a solid D
- no significant personal or NCAA baggage
Honestly, he's a great fit guys. We'd be lucky to have him.
Dan Mullen would be at least a B+ hire. I can't think of a box he doesn't check:
- Has been positional coach for both a #1 pick and a heisman trophy winner
- Has two national titles as an OC
- Has 9 seasons of HC experience in the tougher division of our league
- Sustained success at a lesser program
- Has been recruiting in the south for well over a decade
- is only 45
- Known for running a dynamic offense and having a solid D
- no significant personal or NCAA baggage
Honestly, he's a great fit guys. We'd be lucky to have him.
Sure he was disappointed but that's not why he was upset, it was how he was treated in the process. Very unprofessional.