Here, I will outline why I oppose a hiring of Dan Mullen. It must be stated beforehand, that the standard response to each point is, "but it's at Miss State." That may work for you, but it don't accept it, sorry.
I believe we can disagree, but logical, thought points are more valuable to the board than cheap one liners, which I no doubt play often, so here is my rationale, which you may take or leave.
I challenge you to remove Dan Mullen's name from your head, and think "Coach X" when reviewing the following, and tell me how impressed you are, and how he is instantly the 2nd best coach in the league.
1. Record vs. ranked opponents at the time of play: 6-33 .181 winning %. That's an average of .75 ranked wins per season while losing to 3.66 ranked teams per season.
Three of those wins are detailed below. The other three:
a. LSU this season, when LSU was BAD... losing to Troy at home.
b. 2016 A&M 8-5, unranked at end of year.
c. 2010 Florida 8-5, unranked at end of year.
2. Magical #1 ranking season: Dan Mullen led MS ST to #1 in the nation in an amazing 2014 season, incredibly beating 8 LSU, 6 A&M and 2 Auburn in successive weeks. The #1 rating was absolutely deserving... at the time. As we know, mid-season rankings mean nothing at all. Where teams land in the end is the true test. How did those juggernaut three teams finish out?
LSU 8-5 unranked
A&M 8-5 unranked
Auburn 8-5 22nd and 23rd in polls
In hindsight, how impressed are you with wins over 8-5 teams? Do you expect UGA, Bama, and Florida to put up a lot of 8-5 seasons in the near future? Yet this is Mullen's high water mark, in a 10-3 season.
To recap this point... Dan Mullen has never beaten a team better than an 8-5 record... this year's LSU team, TBD.
3. Has Never Beaten Bama: Almost everyone in the West has beaten Bama since Mullen has been there. He has not.
4. Career Winning %: 66-44 60%. SEC record, 31-37 46%. As we've seen, he's not beaten many ranked teams, so this 60% winning percentage is built on cupcakes.
5. Division Standings: Mississippi State has averaged the position of 4.375 in their division during Mullen's time there.
6. Wins vs. Losses per season: What's our goal? Winning? Mullen has averaged 7.6 wins per season vs. 5.5 losses. When I say he will average 8-9 per year, I think I am being kind in giving him an extra 20% more than what history shows he has averaged. Some think 9-11? Based on what, pixie dust?
7. Recruiting: 247 rankings
Nationally, SEC Average 27th nationally, 9.5th in the SEC.
2017 26th, 9th
2016 28th, 11th
2015 18th, 8th
2014 36th, 12th
2013 24th, 10th
2012 22nd, 9th
2011 41st, 11th
2010 30th 8th
2009 18th 8th
8. But it doesn't matter... he does more with less, more than any coach in 'Merica!: Are you sure? Remember, he's averaging between 4th and 5th in his own division win loss standings.
During the Mullen era (66 wins), USCe has 70, UGA has 78, FL has 71, Mizzou has 65. So, given he's about 4th-5th in his division, and the East has 3 teams ahead of him (W/L) and Mizzou within one game, I'd say that his performance on field is on par with his 9th in conference ranking.
Are you content with being the 9th best SEC team?
Even Tennessee, in what we have considered to be the worst stretch in our history (Kiffin, Dooley, Jones) has won 56 games in the time that Mullen has been at Mississippi State. Mullen is averaging an extra 1.25 wins per year. Let this sink in... hard. Imagine the wonderful things we could have done with an extra 1.25 wins per year!!! Yeah... not much.
Conclusion: Too much time spent on this already, but there are my reasons. "But Miss State" may comfort you, but I personally find these facts very sobering.