AM64
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2016
- Messages
- 28,653
- Likes
- 42,636
So we are arbitrarily changing definitions yet we should still pretend this is scientific and that DSM 5 no longer considering it a mental illness makes these people instantly cured and sane?
Come on. Surely you understand why people would be highly sceptical of this. The whole thing reeks of the attempts by the left to change the definition of racism.
I frequently disagree with you, but not on this one. Just a little looking around and you can come away with DSM could easily stand for the Directorate of Scientific Manipulation.
As GV has pointed out the anatomy of things is generally well defined at birth, but the owners thoughts about the equipment may be less well defined (varying with time and social involvement); so like other areas, psychiatry likes to step in and define "normal" or perhaps the "new normal".
The problem is that it's not really a hard science - frequently just a collection of minds defining norms based on the biases of the definers. It didn't take much effort at all to find a lot of disagreement with the way the latest DSM codes were derived, and they almost certainly do reflect heavy societal and non scientific bias. The new norms might also be heavily influenced by what the legal pill manufacturers and prosthesis manufacturers can conjure up - gotta have that market.
1+1=2 is pretty hard science. A+B-C=sane or nuts? Well that's all in how you define things, but it hard to see how someone could go from one state to another overnight just because a classifying group says it's so and glorify it as "scientific".
Apparently if we could find enough progressive people who accept and revel in paranoia, schizophrenia, and perhaps even "criminally deviant mental behaviors"; those could all be cured overnight, too.