Article ..Vols may double up on QBs

#76
#76
Personally I think CBJ mentioned the two QB system to prevent a potential transfer. Hoping QD comes out against GA TECH and has an excellent game. Need stability at the QB position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#77
#77
Eric Ainge and Brent Schafer....10-3 it can work with the surrounding cast and improved ol play. Just need to hold up at RB. Kelly Runs hard enough to make this work.

IIRC, it was really only a 2 QB system for that first game against UNLV. Ainge got the job after that and never looked back (well, until he was benched in 2005 because he was so bad).
 
#78
#78
Not sure this is thread worthy but here goes. When I heard CBJ mention they may use a 2 QB system it made me wonder. A couple of reasons crossed my mind:

CBJ wants to use a 2 QB system so the other QB doesn't get mad and wants to transfer. i.e. Dormady has shown incredible maturity waiting his turn and probably deserves the start but JG is supremely talented and may not want to wait 1 or 2 years to get the nod. If JG wins the spot Dormady will never see the field if JG plays well. I doubt he would stay. He is too talented.

CBJ truly believes that the system would work even though it has rarely worked in the past for other teams.
I personally don't like the 2 QB system. It's hard for an offense to get in a flow especially if one QB is right handed throwing and the other left handed.

What is Volnation's opinion? Do you think one transfers if a starter is named? Are you a fan of the 2 QB system? :dunno:

If JG wins the job out of Fall camp, Dormady transfers imo. He has two years eligibility and a redshirt to burn for a transfer. JG has four seasons and isn't far behind if at all. He would most likely stay available and compete to win the job. Transferring loses him a season and by the time he starts at another school he would have been starting here anyway...so no benefit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#79
#79
IIRC, it was really only a 2 QB system for that first game against UNLV. Ainge got the job after that and never looked back (well, until he was benched in 2005 because he was so bad).

Thank you...saves me the time. :hi:
 
#80
#80
I personally don't like a 2 QB system unless 1 QB prepares, starts and stays in the game after it starts. That is barring injury or is completely ineffective.
 
#81
#81
Not sure this is thread worthy but here goes. When I heard CBJ mention they may use a 2 QB system it made me wonder. A couple of reasons crossed my mind:

CBJ wants to use a 2 QB system so the other QB doesn't get mad and wants to transfer. i.e. Dormady has shown incredible maturity waiting his turn and probably deserves the start but JG is supremely talented and may not want to wait 1 or 2 years to get the nod. If JG wins the spot Dormady will never see the field if JG plays well. I doubt he would stay. He is too talented.

CBJ truly believes that the system would work even though it has rarely worked in the past for other teams.
I personally don't like the 2 QB system. It's hard for an offense to get in a flow especially if one QB is right handed throwing and the other left handed.

What is Volnation's opinion? Do you think one transfers if a starter is named? Are you a fan of the 2 QB system? :dunno:

Dormady is a junior while Guarantano is a RS freshman. I can see Dormady starting, and Guarantano coming in on special packages for the next two seasons. I had never been a big fan of 2 QB systems, but it worked for Florida when they had Tebow. I hate using Florida as an example, but it is the one example I have seen where 2 QBs were better than one.

If Dormady continues to be the more accurate passer as he seemed during the spring, I believe he opens up as the starter. Who gets how many snaps just has to work itself out. But if your other ten guys work equally well for both? That makes a 2 QB system harder to scheme against.

If it results in more wins? It might be fun. And this was, IMO, very thread worthy.

Edit: Just noticed after posting and had to ask; Is one of our two QBs left handed? I thought both were right handed.
 
Last edited:
#82
#82
In before someone says something silly like this will take UT to the National Championsh......










Nevermind..
 
#83
#83
Personally I think CBJ mentioned the two QB system to prevent a potential transfer. Hoping QD comes out against GA TECH and has an excellent game. Need stability at the QB position.

I don't believe Butch said this for any reason what so ever. Truth is given UT's recent history QD may, in fact, come out and have a poor game due to freshmen at the DT/pass rusher position and due to getting everyone on the same page... then JG comes in and wins the game for us... then, JG progressively showing mistakes as the next couple of games everyone else gets into a rhythm. Then we go back to QD and he wins the season for us and comes out looking like a hero. That kind of scenario is totally plausible so don't be surprised.
 
#85
#85
I don't believe Butch said this for any reason what so ever. Truth is given UT's recent history QD may, in fact, come out and have a poor game due to freshmen at the DT/pass rusher position and due to getting everyone on the same page... then JG comes in and wins the game for us... then, JG progressively showing mistakes as the next couple of games everyone else gets into a rhythm. Then we go back to QD and he wins the season for us and comes out looking like a hero. That kind of scenario is totally plausible so don't be surprised.

Plausible, but not preferable. That is not a two QB system, that is a QB controversy. And while we have seen a two QB system win titles a few times, the QB controversy usually leads to five or six losses. I would prefer to be surprised.
 
#86
#86
I bet CBJ and the staff do not even consider what the fan base thinks when they make player decisions.

In a two QB system they would rotate by default so coaching decisions are a non-factor in this scenario. That is why it is called a two QB system

My comment was about Vol fans affecting a college kid's confidence in a two QB system
 
#88
#88
The 2-QB systems I've seen work best are those with clear roles for the QBs. Like one's a wildcat who can also throw well enough to keep the LBs and CBs honest, while the other is the every-down pocket presence. Or one is a triple-option captain while the other is the leader of the zone read or pro-set packages.

This way, there's no competition between them, it's more a cooperate-and-succeed kind of feeling.

If we do go 2-QB, here's hoping the staff come up with a scheme that makes sense to the players in a collaborative way.
 
#89
#89
He has to win fall camp. And he has to stay healthy. He looked good in the spring, but spring is over. The competition is not.

He has been the best thus far, and there is NO reason to believe that he won't continue to shine in the fall.
 
#90
#90
If the defense goes in thinking QD won't run then when the time is right he could make a long one to change the game or JG could throw the pass that breaks a game wide open.

Once every body sees both can run and pass, they will understand why we are running a 2 QB system(If we are good enough.).
 
Advertisement



Back
Top