Wait, are you suggesting that there may be more involved than posters on VN that scream "I love mediocrity"?
Holy crap. If true, this could throw off the entire balance of the universe. At least for those convinced that 200 VN posters decide who Haslam chooses and what he will pay.
Anarchy.
And I am sure that I just misunderstand the posts of those whose reaction to any and all criticism is to deflect, excuse, or dismiss in an obvious effort to act as if failures aren't really failures but just "reasonable expectations". I am also sure I misunderstand those who make excuses that DIRECTLY imply that UT should not expect more. If you have not seen them.... you aren't looking.
Tisk tisk,
You're changing subjects.
I see them just fine. I also accept that they have different opinions. I also understand that they are in the minority. And to the actual subject, I understand they control nothing.
Remember, the subject is not are there sunshine Pumpers? It was - is that the cause of our issues as you implied earlier with " because too many fans accept mediocrity"
That accusation is false and that was the actual subject of our conversation. 200 VN posters accepting this or that has absolutely zero influence on who we hire or when we fire them.
Is it false? You don't even need a "majority". You just need enough of them to convince the majority to be "patient".
And the people said.... Amen.Nothing more to discuss. This is where we always part ways. You always say something that *at least sounds as if,
everyone else is some kind of sheep led by others.
People have their own thoughts. If enough feel something good is there, maybe that is their own thoughts.
I just don't believe they are controlled by sunshine pumpers or that they need some elites to show them the way.
"Imo" is a hell of a thing. You can believe what you wish without the automatic assumption that all in disagreement are ill informed.
Nothing more to discuss. This is where we always part ways. You always say something that *at least sounds as if,
everyone else is some kind of sheep led by others.
People have their own thoughts. If enough feel something good is there, maybe that is their own thoughts.
I just don't believe they are controlled by sunshine pumpers or that they need some elites to show them the way.
"Imo" is a hell of a thing. You can believe what you wish without the automatic assumption that all in disagreement are ill informed.
I wonder if in addition to potential injuries, he is worried about the players running routes and coverages without coaches there to correct mistakes. Players developing bad habits over the summer that have to be corrected in the fall. Just speculation.
Shula was fired. Dinardo was fired. Paul Hackett was fired. Zook was fired. Hoke was fired. Bill O'Brien was fired.
And while outwardly amiable... I have read that Beamer really didn't want to resign. He just handled it much better than Fulmer.
You have to counterbalance that with the poor play that put them in a bad position to start with.... and the causes for that poor play which include poor game strategy.
So he beat UF and UGA... in games where UT was favored and that gave him credit to balance losing two games that should have been laughers?
I'm not trying to goad you... but do you know how many times that has been posted here since the end of year 2 and especially after year 3? Maybe not you... but if Jones finishes 7-5 and is retained... there will be someone here saying that the "time to perform is 2018"... six years is long enough.
You have to love UT fans for being longsuffering. But one of the reasons we have to be longsuffering is that we are WAY too willing to suffer mediocre performance for a long time.
Yeah... better to tolerate mediocrity than to take a chance that the next guy can take you to the next level, right? If your goal is mediocrity then you don't do anything about a coach producing mediocre results. If your goal is championships... you NEVER tolerate mediocre results.And we will continue to be long-suffering if we keep cycling through coaches.
You have either twisted my words or assigned something to me that I did not say. I have MANY times said Jones has done some good things. However there are patterns in his coaching going back to year one that indicate he is not the coach to take UT to championships. You can't lose to an inferior Vandy roster in year 1 with a bowl on the line for instance. That has been a repeating pattern.You mentioned earlier that Jones has showed any aspect of being a championship coach and that is wrong. The recruiting is there, and now that those recruits are in place, he has to have them stay healthy or at least most of them stay healthy in order to achieve success.
With all due respect, we've heard "before we make a conclusion" pretty much any time a Jones shortcoming has been revealed starting the very first year. First it wasn't his system then it wasn't his players then they weren't mature enough then they weren't deep enough... There's always going to be a next excuse followed by "before we make a conclusion".If Bama lost Humphrey, Allen, Foster, and Anderson for large chunks of the season they wouldn't have been near as good of a defense. The players have to be on the field to make a difference. Butch has gone out of his comfort zone and made personnel and coaching changes for the betterment of the team. Lets let those changes, hopefully, combine with a healthy season before we make a conclusion.
Yeah... better to tolerate mediocrity than to take a chance that the next guy can take you to the next level, right? If your goal is mediocrity then you don't do anything about a coach producing mediocre results. If your goal is championships... you NEVER tolerate mediocre results.
You have either twisted my words or assigned something to me that I did not say. I have MANY times said Jones has done some good things. However there are patterns in his coaching going back to year one that indicate he is not the coach to take UT to championships. You can't lose to an inferior Vandy roster in year 1 with a bowl on the line for instance. That has been a repeating pattern.
UT has had high attrition since Jones arrived. Jones has had higher than average injury rates and is just now changing staff and philosophy in S&C. Jones' game management problems are well documented. For two years, Jones pushed what seemed to be excessive levels of physicality and fatigue (pace) in fall camp. UT had lots of August injuries. Last year, he seemed to swing to the opposite extreme allowing Hurd and others to take days off on their own discretion. UT had more injuries during the season. These are real problems that seem to continue to plague UT even as the good things Jones HAS done have resulted in better results.
You could say that Jones has lead the team half way up the mountain... but that isn't a guarantee he can take them the rest of the way. That may take someone else... perhaps even someone else who wouldn't have been able to rebuild the program from where it was to where it is.
With all due respect, we've heard "before we make a conclusion" pretty much any time a Jones shortcoming has been revealed starting the very first year. First it wasn't his system then it wasn't his players then they weren't mature enough then they weren't deep enough... There's always going to be a next excuse followed by "before we make a conclusion".
There are reasons Bama didn't lose those players... and others as to why it wouldn't have mattered that much if they had. They have depth. They have a consistent philosophy and method for developing and maintaining the health of players. These aren't incidental things. They are the direct results of Saban's actions and choices.
This will make no difference on anything.
:lolabove: Nice comeback. Ignore the weaknesses Jones has shown and counter with "there's no Saban waiting for the job".And uninformed fans like yourself are always going to assume that there is another Saban waiting in the wings while we toil with this middling coach.
And the injuries did that because.... Almost every reason is indirectly or directly the result of a Jones decision or action.Truth is plenty of programs in the country would like to have a coach the caliber of Butch and he has enough good qualities to offer that he should be given another opportunity, considering the massive amount of personnel losses on defense last year. The team was 5-0 and giving up 23 ppg before injuries mounted and was 3-4 giving up 33 ppg after injuries mounted. (And that includes giving up 0 to Tenn tech).
It is an excuse when you ignore the fact that Jones built the roster, managed practice, chose his coaches, and led the staff who developed and coached the players.It's not an excuse if facts and stats back it up. The reason the teamed swooned down the stretch last year was injuries.
On the "whose next" question... there are a TON of guys who can give you mediocre results. There's also the next Meyer or Saban out there waiting for the right chance in the right job. The timing was wrong but I would have LOVED to have seen Fuente as UT's HC.
If you fire your mediocre coach (assuming Jones doesn't turn the corner) then you at least have a shot at something better. If you don't... not only will you not get something better... you are all but certain to watch a decline similar to the one that ended Fulmer's career. There is no treading water... in part because even mediocre players think they're worthy of playing on a good team. You just can't get the players unless you produce the results.