Good news for AJ Johnson

#52
#52
feathersax said:
She's the ultra-liberal reporter for the Nashville Tennessean who has been attacking UT with unsubstantiated columns for a while. Pure evil whose agenda is against everything I believe in. :crazy:
Click to expand...

Anita is a Cal-Berkeley grad... Calling her an ultra-liberal gives ultra-liberals a bad name. She is a man hating kook. Her coverage of the Title IX suit was incredibly one sided.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#53
#53
Anita doesn't bother to hide her bias. She skews the facts to further her personal agenda and omits pertinent information that doesn't fit her narrative. She's the poster hack for what's wrong with today's media.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#54
#54
LA Vol said:
Anita doesn't bother to hide her bias. She skews the facts to further her personal agenda and omits pertinent information that doesn't fit her narrative. She's the poster hack for what's wrong with today's media.
Click to expand...

Absolutely right. She never once mentioned how Drae Bowles had given a contradictory account in a local media interview. She took what was alleged in the suit as indisputable and ran with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#55
#55
This has been a embarrassing display of justice. I said in the beginning in this situation that these women were shady, it's a travesty it has taken this long. AJ should not have maybe been seeing her as I believe he had a girlfriend but that is no excuse for vindictive women to skate on all these lies. And it has LINGERED WAY TOO LONG! GBO!!!!
 
#58
#58
If the charges are dismissed, technically, the defendants could sue for financial damages, though it's not really feasible. Proving malicious prosecution would be extremely difficult. The judge ruled that the prosecution had probable cause. There are a lot of questions in this case, both about the accuser and about the collection and preservation of evidence, but the exception for prosecutorial immunity is unlikely to apply.
 
#59
#59
Seems like the DA is hanging the case on the co-defendant. Anybody know EXACTLY what he did or was he was accused of? Was it a DP move and after she reflected back on it, it made her feel less worthy?

That's the only thing I can think of.
 
#61
#61
gunner said:
It's doubtful such content still exists unless law enforcement or a court sent legal notifications to preserve it.
Click to expand...

I think they keep it for at least 10 years. Don't remember the case, but there was a defendant who wasn't even a suspect for 5 years and they had everything on him.
 
#62
#62
butchna said:
I think they keep it for at least 10 years. Don't remember the case, but there was a defendant who wasn't even a suspect for 5 years and they had everything on him.
Click to expand...

Ha ha, telecommunication companies are notorious for NOT preserving data when requested by legal process. Most companies claim that they only preserve the data for a few days or weeks on their servers. In some cases they just refuse to comply when presented with a legal process for the evidence as they cite privacy concerns for their customers.
 
#63
#63
gunner said:
Ha ha, telecommunication companies are notorious for NOT preserving data when requested by legal process. Most companies claim that they only preserve the data for a few days or weeks on their servers. In some cases they just refuse to comply when presented with a legal process for the evidence as they cite privacy concerns for their customers.
Click to expand...

It's extremely doubtful that this data still exist and the defense attorneys know it. That may be what utimately gets the case dismissed.
 
Last edited:
#64
#64
gunner said:
Ha ha, telecommunication companies are notorious for NOT preserving data when requested by legal process. Most companies claim that they only preserve the data for a few days or weeks on their servers. In some cases they just refuse to comply when presented with a legal process for the evidence as they cite privacy concerns for their customers.
Click to expand...

Think you're wrong.
 
#66
#66
HuntlandVolinColo said:
Ideally, the case will be dropped and AJ can enter the draft...assuming he is still in football shape. One less black eye for Tennessee.
Click to expand...

I saw him working out with Marlin Lane last year. However, I haven't seen or heard anything about him lately. I think his chances of playing again are very slim.
 
#67
#67
gunner said:
I appreciate your opinion, but I do this professionally. My opinions are based on real world practical experience that involves investigating criminal behavior. What do you base your opinion on?
Click to expand...

Never mind, not worth the argument.
 
#68
#68
gunner said:
I appreciate your opinion, but I do this professionally. My opinions are based on real world practical experience that involves investigating criminal behavior. What do you base your opinion on?
Click to expand...

So you have "experience" dealing with telecommunications companies instantly deleting texts and social media? Hence the "notorious"? Internet security was my field and my clients kept EVERYTHING dating back 10 years. The information is there...a court order may not be enough to tap it tho.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#69
#69
butchna said:
So you have "experience" dealing with telecommunications companies instantly deleting texts and social media? Hence the "notorious"? Internet security was my field and my clients kept EVERYTHING dating back 10 years. The information is there...a court order may not be enough to tap it tho.
Click to expand...

I have pratical experience in law enforcement and conducting criminal investigations, and based on my experience it will be extremely difficult to get the data described in the case. If law enforcement didn't request it early on in the investigation, it is very unlikely they will get it now. In regards to text messaging, I have served search warrants to companies that were preceded by a preservation letter within days of the event only to be informed that the data that I requested no longer exists.

If the data in this case can't be retrieved and admitted as evidence, it's very likely the criminal charges will be dismissed as the defense attorney will simply make the argument that the prosecution failed to preserve evidence that would have exonerated his client. If the data was preserved and it can be retrieved and gets in as evidence it could exonerate both of the defendants. Either way it may be good news for them.
 
#72
#72
Remy said:
Didn't we used to have a RIGHT to a speedy trial??? What happened to it???
Click to expand...

You have to request it to enforce it. With recent ruling Case likely dismissed due to states failure to preserve exculpatory evidence.
 
#73
#73
greenbacknative said:
There is a lesson in this story.. choose those you hang out/party with wisely. They could greatly influence your life down the road.. good or bad.. Think with the big head instead of the little one.
Click to expand...

As long as morning after regret translates to a rape accusation, going to college and having fun is over for athletes, especially star athletes.

1) ONE girlfriend in college - choose wisely
2) Condom everytime
3) Text with her often = good as saying yes for the most part
4) Print all FB conversations both her site and yours
5) Keep your phone for at least 10 years
6) Don't invite your posse in the bedroom to create issues.
7) And if she says no, IT MEANS NO.


I don't know, add to the list. I don't believe there is anyway to prevent this from happening occasionally with today's litigious society.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#74
#74
butchna said:
So you have "experience" dealing with telecommunications companies instantly deleting texts and social media? Hence the "notorious"? Internet security was my field and my clients kept EVERYTHING dating back 10 years. The information is there...a court order may not be enough to tap it tho.
Click to expand...

Depends on who you worked for butch.....a private company that kept records for corporate security or a telecommunications company like Verizon or AT&T. The two have entirely different data retention requirements one would thank.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#75
#75
Remy said:
Didn't we used to have a RIGHT to a speedy trial??? What happened to it???
Click to expand...

I love people like you. People were adding to the conversation then you add the arbitrary speedy trial myth. Please, get over the speedy trial thing people.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top