To Protect and to Serve II

#2,504
#2,504
utvols88 said:
That dude was not helping himself by acting like a child.
Click to expand...

Or, ya know, that his "evidence" regarding Michael Brown is completely false and misinformed.

The guy is garnering attention to himself for the overall benefit of his documentary. No publicity is bad publicity, I suppose.
 
#2,509
#2,509
hndog609 said:
That is a bit of a head scratcher. I've seen the video and can't explain where the issue would be.
Click to expand...

The most damning evidence was where he picked up the Taser and placed it next to the body. Based on that alone, the defense had no defense when they keep saying "well, the perpetrator got control of and tried to use the Taser on the officer."

Freaking night school educated rookie lawyer could blow that out of the water with a single question.

"Why did you do that?"

And guilty.
 
#2,510
#2,510
Grand Vol said:
The most damning evidence was where he picked up the Taser and placed it next to the body. Based on that alone, the defense had no defense when they keep saying "well, the perpetrator got control of and tried to use the Taser on the officer."

Freaking night school educated rookie lawyer could blow that out of the water with a single question.

"Why did you do that?"

And guilty.
Click to expand...

Yep, not to mention clear cut forensics of multiple gunshots to the back from a distance.
 
#2,511
#2,511
hndog609 said:
Yep, not to mention clear cut forensics of multiple gunshots to the back from a distance.
Click to expand...

That isn't a clear cut case of guilty though even though it looks bad from a forensic standpoint. It could be explained away, however, the video showing exactly what happened is the nail in the coffin.
 
#2,512
#2,512
Grand Vol said:
That isn't a clear cut case of guilty though even though it looks bad from a forensic standpoint. It could be explained away, however, the video showing exactly what happened is the nail in the coffin.
Click to expand...

The real point is they had all that evidence and yet...
 
#2,513
#2,513
utvols88 said:
That dude was not helping himself by acting like a child.
Click to expand...

He did what he had to do to get his points in before the lady could distort the message. Fact is that the media and the police used the video from the following morning to paint a picture that leads the viewers to believe that Mike Brown just walked up and snatched some cigarillos for no damn reason. Now we know that there is a back story.

It also makes you question the original narrative of the shooting. I mean, if they would lie about the incident in the store before he was shot, what makes you think they couldn't have lied/distorted the narrative behind his encounter with Darren Wilson?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#2,514
#2,514
Rasputin_Vol said:
He did what he had to do to get his points in before the lady could distort the message. Fact is that the media and the police used the video from the following morning to paint a picture that leads the viewers to believe that Mike Brown just walked up and snatched some cigarillos for no damn reason. Now we know that there is a back story.

It also makes you question the original narrative of the shooting. I mean, if they would lie about the incident in the store before he was shot, what makes you think they couldn't have lied/distorted the narrative behind his encounter with Darren Wilson?
Click to expand...

So did he steal the cigarillos?
 
#2,515
#2,515
Obsessed said:
So did he steal the cigarillos?
Click to expand...

Tough to say. The first video raises doubts about the original story of him just walking in and taking something that didn't belong to him.

There is really only one of two answers. Either he stole them or he took something that rightfully belonged to him.
 
#2,516
#2,516
Rasputin_Vol said:
He did what he had to do to get his points in before the lady could distort the message. Fact is that the media and the police used the video from the following morning to paint a picture that leads the viewers to believe that Mike Brown just walked up and snatched some cigarillos for no damn reason. Now we know that there is a back story.

It also makes you question the original narrative of the shooting. I mean, if they would lie about the incident in the store before he was shot, what makes you think they couldn't have lied/distorted the narrative behind his encounter with Darren Wilson?
Click to expand...

His points don't resonate when he shouts over the questions and rebuttal before it's even finished. He wasn't interested in debate. He was only interested in acting like an asshat, which he did. I have no respect for him or his message when he chooses that delivery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#2,518
#2,518
So is this a separate incident that you're talking about or are you talking about the robbery just before he made contact with Darren Wilson?
 
#2,522
#2,522
Rasputin_Vol said:
Did you even look at the video?
Click to expand...

Yes, smarta**, I did. What I'm unclear on is whether this filmmaker is referring to an incident that I'm not aware of regarding Michael Brown; whether there is another alleged robbery involving him, other than the one that occurred just before Darren Wilson making contact with him walking in the middle of the street, matching the description of the suspect of a robbery that had just occurred.

Because, regardless of what happened at the convenience store, it doesn't change what happened in the street, Brown attempted to go for an officer's gun and was killed because of it.

THREE autopsies proved Wilson's statements were true and that there was no way Brown was turned away from Wilson, running from him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#2,523
#2,523
orangeblood79 said:
Yes, smarta**, I did. What I'm unclear on is whether this filmmaker is referring to an incident that I'm not aware of regarding Michael Brown; whether there is another alleged robbery involving him, other than the one that occurred just before Darren Wilson making contact with him walking in the middle of the street, matching the description of the suspect of a robbery that had just occurred.

Because, regardless of what happened at the convenience store, it doesn't change what happened in the street, Brown attempted to go for an officer's gun and was killed because of it.

THREE autopsies proved Wilson's statements were true and that there was no way Brown was turned away from Wilson, running from him.
Click to expand...

You obviously didn't look at the video.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,524
#2,524
orangeblood79 said:
Because, regardless of what happened at the convenience store, it doesn't change what happened in the street, Brown attempted to go for an officer's gun and was killed because of it.
Click to expand...

What went on in the convenience store attacks at the very credibility of the entire narrative. They intentionally suppressed this video to make Mike Brown look like a menace. If they would lie about the circumstances leading up to his death, why wouldn't they create a false narrative about how he died?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#2,525
#2,525
Rasputin_Vol said:
What went on in the convenience store attacks at the very credibility of the entire narrative. They intentionally suppressed this video to make Mike Brown look like a menace. If they would lie about the circumstances leading up to his death, why wouldn't they create a false narrative about how he died?
Click to expand...

None of this matters one way or the other.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement













Back
Top