volfaninpa
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2011
- Messages
- 6,249
- Likes
- 21,478
Found this interesting. This is a breakdown of prospects signed by conference division
SEC West teams signed 173 players:
- 5* = 11
- 4* = 66
- 3* = 82
- 2* = 14
SEC East teams signed 170 players:
- 5* = 2
- 4* = 50
- 3* = 102
- 2* = 16
Rankings are according to Rivals, and based on Rivals' rankings, the two 5*'s from the East were both signed by UGA. Seven of the 11 West 5*'s were signed by Bama, three for LSU, and one for A&M.
The East has great depth.
I think this is an effect of the Bama dominance. The SEC won't see this in fact they'll refuse to see it, but if they keep pumping Bama then the rest of the SEC will suffer because recruits will see it as "if only Bama is good then why should we go to the other SEC schools" and that will make them look at other conferences that have 3 or 4 constantly at the top instead of just 1Lol.
Just looking it all over briefly, it seems the West's star distribution is highly influenced by Bama and LSU, who account for basically half (30) of the total 66 4*'s. Otherwise, it appears the teams within the conference are pretty even outside of maybe UGA.
From looking at the overall team rankings and outside the conference, it is even more clear than last year, IMO, that the SEC is not going to be the dominant conference it was once perceived as being.
I think this is an effect of the Bama dominance. The SEC won't see this in fact they'll refuse to see it, but if they keep pumping Bama then the rest of the SEC will suffer because recruits will see it as "if only Bama is good then why should we go to the other SEC schools" and that will make them look at other conferences that have 3 or 4 constantly at the top instead of just 1
I think this is an effect of the Bama dominance. The SEC won't see this in fact they'll refuse to see it, but if they keep pumping Bama then the rest of the SEC will suffer because recruits will see it as "if only Bama is good then why should we go to the other SEC schools" and that will make them look at other conferences that have 3 or 4 constantly at the top instead of just 1
You mean that Defense that needed 5 turnovers from VT to win? That defense that smothered Ohio and kept them to from moving the ball all day? That same defense that allowed UGA to put up 31 and hit a 40+ yard explosive play because their coaches were too da*& stupid to have the CBs walked off the LOS at least 10 yards with less than 40 seconds left in the game? That same defense that gave up how many yards to aTm?
Please..........just keep making excuses boys....:crazy:
