Immigration Ban

#552
#552
BowlBrother85 said:
Speaking of the roll out of the travel ban, Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Bob Corker - a Tennessee Republican said:

"They know it could have been done better. They probably learned that communication and the inter-agency process would probably be helpful." - Sen. Bob Corker (R)

I guess this makes Corker a left wing idiot, right?
Click to expand...

He is a phony...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#559
#559
newarkvol said:
Are you speaking of this The Immigration Restriction Act of 1924, was designed consciously to halt the immigration of supposedly "dysgenic" Italians and eastern European Jews, whose numbers had grown during the period from 1900 to 1920. ...yeah this was eugenics..you a fan?-

How about this:
HTML:
...why should this piece of detritus be a citizen of this great nationView attachment 127612 while: View attachment 127613

one difference between the two gentlemen is that , ... well, the Tennessee guy was arrested for lewd acts involving a minor.. the other is an engineer and can't get into the country to escape persecution...which would you rather have as a neighbor? Answer honestly!
Click to expand...

Lol. Your argument is that since we have criminals in our country, we should openly invite every and any one into the country? That's your argument?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#560
#560
newarkvol said:
Yeah, but aren't you the meme guy?...I mean that's how you communicate your thoughts right? ....or is that FL69?..I get mixed up....It all sounds so similarly imbecilic...Do you guys live together? Anyway...I know long form journalism is hard and you must be busy choosing your next meme for your 19,134th post...
uuuhhhh....yeah the countries are the same BUT EVERTHING ELSE? and thats the point , moron

Why comparing Trump's and Obama's immigration restrictions is flawed | PolitiFact


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ilar-to-obama-in-2011/?utm_term=.42cc789bed8e

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...n-differs-obama-2011-policy-article-1.2959631

Trump's refugee order not same as Obama's in 2011
Click to expand...

As you call people morons, remember that you're in a thread that accused Trump of self-interests in how he chose the countries.

Be careful with your insults; they can backfire on you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#561
#561
tumscalcium said:
I wonder if they've ever thought of trying to be happy. I doubt it.
Click to expand...

Trump was elected President to protect this nation. If those on the left have trouble with a [90 day ban] then they should go ahead & move out of the US & stay where they are better off than living in America & putting up w/Trump as President.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#562
#562
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Trump was elected President to protect this nation. If those on the left have trouble with a [90 day ban] then they should go ahead & move out of the US & stay where they are better off than living in America & putting up w/Trump as President.
Click to expand...

Interestingly enough, if every Dem in America (except Gov't Dems) revoked their citizenship and moved tomorrow, the Dems would still post millions of votes per election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#563
#563
newarkvol said:
Are you speaking of this The Immigration Restriction Act of 1924, was designed consciously to halt the immigration of supposedly "dysgenic" Italians and eastern European Jews, whose numbers had grown during the period from 1900 to 1920. ...yeah this was eugenics..you a fan?-

How about this:
HTML:
...why should this piece of detritus be a citizen of this great nationView attachment 127612 while: View attachment 127613

one difference between the two gentlemen is that , ... well, the Tennessee guy was arrested for lewd acts involving a minor.. the other is an engineer and can't get into the country to escape persecution...which would you rather have as a neighbor? Answer honestly!
Click to expand...

Apples and .... chairs.
One is born here. The other not.

If the engineer is muslim then it 'may be' - notice ..MAY be..apples and apples.


Muhammad's Marriage to a Prepubescent Girl and its Moral Implications


Look up 'muslim thighing'
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#565
#565
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#566
#566
newarkvol said:
Come on now!...I don't even believe in the sky god but if you must :
The flight into Egypt is a biblical event described in the Gospel of Matthew (Matthew 2:13-23), in which Joseph fled to Egypt with Mary and infant son Jesus after a visit by the Magi, because they learned that King Herod intended to kill the infants of that area.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the Sunday School lesson. I was aware. The comparison is ludicrous.

No need to act like the smartest guy in the room.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#568
#568
golfballs said:
Cato - the same place that claims it's illegal. They're hacks
Click to expand...

Link?

The article says nothing about legality*, but it is 663 words of quality research and logical reasoning. I would guess the reason you are bringing up legality is you don't have a single valid response to their critique of the ex O.

*Even if it did, there are a lot of smart people who are saying this is unlawful. It doesn't make you a hack. Our laws are complicated and ****ed. Also, they are policy wonks, not lawyers. Their expertise is in policy-making not the actual law. You can't dismiss their policy analysis because they might be wrong about the legality of an issue.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#570
#570
Septic said:
Mary is widely believed to be 12-14 and Joseph was around 90 when they were hitched.

That s#it was normal back then, deal with it.
Click to expand...

I like how non-believers (atheists) think they know more about the bible & preach it to the believers of the faith....we really take you serious on your knowledge of that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#571
#571
n_huffhines said:
Link?

The article says nothing about legality*, but it is 663 words of quality research and logical reasoning. I would guess the reason you are bringing up legality is you don't have a single valid response to their critique of the ex O.

*Even if it did, there are a lot of smart people who are saying this is unlawful. It doesn't make you a hack. Our laws are complicated and ****ed. Also, they are policy wonks, not lawyers. Their expertise is in policy-making not the actual law. You can't dismiss their policy analysis because they might be wrong about the legality of an issue.
Click to expand...

Well the guy who write on their behalf in matters of immigration says it's illegal. And he's wrong
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/01/27/opinion/trumps-immigration-ban-is-illegal.html
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#573
#573
I can't wait until the supreme court rules that it's illegal. What straw will you grasp for then?

If your only defense of a policy is "it's legal" then you're not on firm ground.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#575
#575
Orange_Crush said:
As you call people morons, remember that you're in a thread that accused Trump of self-interests in how he chose the countries.

Be careful with your insults; they can backfire on you.
Click to expand...

Don't believe that to be true. All I said was that the appearance of conflict of interest is there and an argument can be made. An accusation was never leveled either way.

That is the way it was meant, anyway.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top