PizzaGate

#576
#576
lawgator1 said:
Sigh.

A website not owned by the government can kill whatever threads it wants to. And in a sense, a place like Reddit shutting one like this down, in order to funnel all the loons to a smaller number of contained locales makes sense.

No reason to risk spread of whatever mental illness you have. You guys should definitely be playing in your own sandbox. Keep the rest of us safe
Click to expand...


You still haven't answered the question about what evidence, specifically, would you need to demand a formal investigation be opened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#577
#577
PKT_VOL said:
How would you know they are not investigating?

Reporting a conclusion based on the facts as they know or understand them today in no way precludes a media entity from continuing an investigation behind closed doors, starting an investigation, or reporting that their original reporting ending up being incorrect via new information that became available at a later date.
Click to expand...

I suppose that's true. It sure doesn't seem like any of that is happening or will happen. You claim that all the media would be chomping at the bit to prove this story true, but the current CEO of the NYT helped cover up what would have been one of the biggest stories of the decade while he was at the BBC (Jimmy Saville pedo ring). So there's a history of at least one current media big whig covering a very similar scandal. Why can't that happen again?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#578
#578
lawgator1 said:
Sigh.

A website not owned by the government can kill whatever threads it wants to. And in a sense, a place like Reddit shutting one like this down, in order to funnel all the loons to a smaller number of contained locales makes sense.

No reason to risk spread of whatever mental illness you have. You guys should definitely be playing in your own sandbox. Keep the rest of us safe
Click to expand...

Oh, and you're okay with reddit shutting down the pizzagate discussion, but leaving a subredddit open called pedofriends?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#579
#579
Just because I like to fuel your theorizing, this was on imgur today:

bNRVYrJ.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#580
#580
JackWhite said:
You still haven't answered the question about what evidence, specifically, would you need to demand a formal investigation be opened.
Click to expand...

if this was a gop issue. LG would demand that an investigation should occur because of the seriousness of the accusation.

he would claim we must investigate 1st to see what we find.

i believe this happened against Bush sr. some whackjob liberal demanded some investigation though there was no evidence. he claimed that if there is a serious accusation, then we must investigate to find evidence. even though there was no evidence. they did investigate and found nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#581
#581
joevol320 said:
if this was a gop issue. LG would demand that an investigation should occur because of the seriousness of the accusation.

he would claim we must investigate 1st to see what we find.

i believe this happened against Bush sr. some whackjob liberal demanded some investigation though there was no evidence. he claimed that if there is a serious accusation, then we must investigate to find evidence. even though there was no evidence. they did investigate and found nothing.
Click to expand...

There was credible evidence during the Bush Sr. administration also. Craig Spence was giving midnight tours of the White House to young male prostitutes. That doesn't prove Bush Sr. or his cabinet were involved, but it should have been thoroughly investigated because the Republicans appear to have their own secrets in this regard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#582
#582
joevol320 said:
if this was a gop issue. LG would demand that an investigation should occur because of the seriousness of the accusation.

he would claim we must investigate 1st to see what we find.

i believe this happened against Bush sr. some whackjob liberal demanded some investigation though there was no evidence. he claimed that if there is a serious accusation, then we must investigate to find evidence. even though there was no evidence. they did investigate and found nothing.
Click to expand...


No.

It's stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#585
#585
JackWhite said:
What evidence, specifically, would make you call to open an investigation?
Click to expand...

Give it up. You won't see him in this thread again until Hillary secretly has Alefantis killed so she and her slurpers can blame the "alt right" conspiracy "fake news" spreaders.
 
#586
#586
SamRebel35 said:
Give it up. You won't see him in this thread again until Hillary secretly has Alefantis killed so she and her slurpers can blame the "alt right" conspiracy "fake news" spreaders.
Click to expand...

:lolabove:

So you have a conspiracy theory already loaded up to assign guilt for a murder that is yet to happen?

That is so incredibly awesome man! I understand now that this is all real and I apologize for not taking it more seriously.

tumblr_nyo3nqtgMh1tslewgo1_400.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#587
#587
Rifleman said:
:lolabove:

So you have a conspiracy theory already loaded up to assign guilt for a murder that is yet to happen?

That is so incredibly awesome man! I understand now that this is all real and I apologize for not taking it more seriously.

tumblr_nyo3nqtgMh1tslewgo1_400.gif
Click to expand...

Hey Zeus Chreesto, it's called a joke.
 
#589
#589
Irony. Washington Post article about fake news admits that article is based on fake news.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...16af66098fe_story.html?utm_term=.40844da80067

"Editor’s Note: The Washington Post on Nov. 24 published a story on the work of four sets of researchers who have examined what they say are Russian propaganda efforts to undermine American democracy and interests. One of them was PropOrNot, a group that insists on public anonymity, which issued a report identifying more than 200 websites that, in its view, wittingly or unwittingly published or echoed Russian propaganda. A number of those sites have objected to being included on PropOrNot’s list, and some of the sites, as well as others not on the list, have publicly challenged the group’s methodology and conclusions. The Post, which did not name any of the sites, does not itself vouch for the validity of PropOrNot’s findings regarding any individual media outlet, nor did the article purport to do so. Since publication of The Post’s story, PropOrNot has removed some sites from its list."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#591
#591
YorkVol,
Thanks for post 579. I have tried to follow the pizzagate conspiracy, but like most people, don't have the time to dig into page after page of reddit posts. Assuming that all of the material in your post is factual, I can say at the very least that there is some creepy stuff there. Hopefully some law enforcement agency does their due diligence. Any one piece of "evidence" doesn't look suspicious, but when you put it all together, it looks sinister. Could it all be a coincidence? Sure, but that's why someone in law enforcement needs to be looking at this quietly.

If it's truly a sinister ring of child trafficking pedos, all of the public scrutiny will make them cover up evidence. If it's not factual, innocent people could be victimized by well meaning amateur detectives. Bottom line is I hope the right agency is looking into this.
:hi:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#592
#592
jamesd1628 said:
Irony. Washington Post article about fake news admits that article is based on fake news.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...16af66098fe_story.html?utm_term=.40844da80067

"Editor’s Note: The Washington Post on Nov. 24 published a story on the work of four sets of researchers who have examined what they say are Russian propaganda efforts to undermine American democracy and interests. One of them was PropOrNot, a group that insists on public anonymity, which issued a report identifying more than 200 websites that, in its view, wittingly or unwittingly published or echoed Russian propaganda. A number of those sites have objected to being included on PropOrNot’s list, and some of the sites, as well as others not on the list, have publicly challenged the group’s methodology and conclusions. The Post, which did not name any of the sites, does not itself vouch for the validity of PropOrNot’s findings regarding any individual media outlet, nor did the article purport to do so. Since publication of The Post’s story, PropOrNot has removed some sites from its list."
Click to expand...

Another interesting tidbit regarding "fake news"... For years the MSM quoted the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights when outlining atrocities. The group sounds like an authority on the subject. In reality, The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights is one man in Britain who owns a t-shirt store. He hasn't been to Syria in years and when he did live in Syria, he spent a lot of time in jail. Not exactly an impartial/informed/authoritative source lol.
 
#593
#593
My belief is that Podesta is a pedo and is affiliated with some sketchy people. The media/law enforcement should be inquiring as to the emails that were obviously coded/cryptic. Podesta and the pizza place owner should be the primary targets of the investigation. This may be happening behind the scenes, I have no idea.

As for Clinton/Democratic party, it is a huge stretch with the evidence I have seen that there is some large pedo ring going on.
 
#595
#595
SamRebel35 said:
Laura Silsby? Monica Peterson?
Click to expand...

Silsby is the only thing that gives me pause but I think the more likely scenario is Clinton just did a favor for Epstein/Podesta. Remember, she will do anything for money. Maybe she herself is a part of a larger ring, but I think it is more likely that she just has ties to certain pedos.

Who is Monica Peterson?
 
#596
#596
vols4sure said:
Silsby is the only thing that gives me pause but I think the more likely scenario is Clinton just did a favor for Epstein/Podesta. Remember, she will do anything for money. Maybe she herself is a part of a larger ring, but I think it is more likely that she just has ties to certain pedos.

Who is Monica Peterson?
Click to expand...

for those that are critical about this, snopes says unproven, not false.

Monica Petersen Killed for Investigating Clinton-Related Sex Trafficking in Haiti? : snopes.com

she was a volunteer worker in Haiti working on child abductions. Made a find, reported to her superiors but before she can tell anyone she kills herself. I still haven't seen anything official about cause of death but some rumors was she shot herself, despite being anti gun and not owning a gun. but that detail is even more flimsy that the rest of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#597
#597
Youtube has been censoring pizzagate videos and red flagging them...... But they allow this?

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v__cm94FhmE[/youtube]
 
Last edited:
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top