:thumbsup:I probably should post on this thread as a visitor, but ...
Last year TN struggled against every team that decided to commit to playing zone against them, and they lost a lot of those games to less talented teams. In watching them play offense against a zone it appeared that not one player or coach had a clue about fundamental principles of attacking zone defenses. So as an outsider it was pretty surprising to see this problem appear early in the year, and reappear, and reappear, and never see any sign that someone was making changes in practice. And we are now 12 months later, a new year, and the exact same issue shows up again. There are a dozen really good books and as many good video tapes on coaching principles of offense against a zone - I can't believe that the HC and all three assistants have never stumbled across any of these, and after last year i can't believe they didn't actively seek them out - but based on this single game that appears to be the case. Again the players and the coaches didn't appear to have a clue.
You can blame players for not hitting shots or failing to box out, but these are 18-21 year olds that need coaching and guidance - you can't beat a zone defense one on one - that is what it is designed to protect against - you have to beat a zone as a team and that takes coaching.
Another thought to those who want to think that TN uniquely gets players that were 'overrated' coming out of HS. This has been a lament of some TN fans every year since that last monster class at the end of Pat's tenure. At some point you can't keep pointing at the recruits, you have to start looking at the coaching they are getting - sure the rating system for HS players is flawed, but it is flawed in the same way for all recruits for all schools. And it is mostly flawed in underestimating some under the radar players that blossom in college. The real difference in results over a decent sample size comes down to the teaching and coaching and leadership they get in college.
I despise than guy up north just like all you folks does, but I can right off think of a few others that are nearly as good. This don't mean they would ever end up here. Schaefer at MState, Bruno at DePaul, Tara at Stanford, Muffett at ND. I am sure there are others and probably some great up and comers/.
Our Lady Vols will be in for a fight against the Lady Lions but will put on a show and prevail victorious!
A positive from this game--- Post game, Holly seems pissed. She usually just seems disappointed & dumbfounded. Today she seemed pissed! I like that! & she actually called it as it was. Uninspired!
The key here is the absence of a truly great point guard. Reynolds is lacking in so many fundamental skills and Middleton is better suited to shooting guard due to her slow foot speed. We miss Cooper. She and Hayes should give us top-notch play next year if Holly lets them shine.
Here's the good news: If Holly can't get it done by the end of next year (when she'll finally have a deep, talent-laden roster), the new head coach will have a quality lineup from which to build success.
This current team has no fire, determination or guts. And for some confounding reason, the head coach consistently seems baffled beyond belief.
Wasn't able to watch this game, but I'm interested to see how the "read and react" offense develops over time. As someone else mentioned, we may not have the best roster for it now, but it's probably a smart move long-term. It's what UConn's been doing for years and I believe ND as well.
There's a lot of "doom and gloom" talk here, but I see some encouraging signs as compared to last year, including Diamond still showing up when her shots aren't falling (5 assists, 2 steals, a block), improved A/TO ratio against the zone, increased aggression from Russell and Nared, and others have mentioned they found their spots in the zone but just couldn't hit good looks.
Agreed that the one-on-one defense is troubling - would like to see us use the zone more with this roster.
They didn't force the ball inside, which accounted for the low turnovers. But Diamond and Alexa were the only perimeter players who tried to attack the zone using the dribble. Diamond missed most of her shots and Alexa was too slow to get very far. The rest of the perimeter players (and sometimes Nared) just hovered around the 3 point line and jacked up 3s that they bricked. I saw at least 2 airballs off uncontested 3s (one of which turned into an assist to Russell - best pass of the night!).
The guard play - Jordan, Alexa and MeMe - was the main culprit in this game. They just have to be better in terms of taking/making open shots, moving without the basketball and playing defense. These deficiencies can be masked on the days that Mercedes, Jaime and Diamond are all able to score, but those 3 guards need to step it up and be dependable when the shots aren't falling for all of the Big Three. Nunn and Dunbar also have to be reliable options off the bench. Right now, Nunn is not helping the team at all. Mercedes played 37 minutes, Jaime played 40 minutes. And this is against a pretty weak team. They can't go through the whole season playing those kinds of minutes. Nunn and Dunbar need to step it up, big time.
I thought I saw some zone from Tennessee last night. When that happened, PSU got the ball to Paige and she would attack the holes in the zone to get all the way to the basket for an uncontested basket. That's what the LV guards need to practice.
As for Nunn Dunbar Holly needs to light a fire under there rear. We all know Pat would have been face to face with the two letting them know there play is unacceptable.
Or it could be that they just aren't that good. Let's be fair to Schaquila. She wasn't a top HS prospect, she transferred from a weak school in a weak conference, and she wouldn't have gotten a single look from Tennessee if not for the fact that Holly struck out on Cox, Holmes and McCoy. There shouldn't have been much different expectations for her than there was for Kamara Harris. Both were brought in for depth, although some on this board were predicting Schaquila would be an upgrade from Bashaara before she played a single game. Even then, she doesn't need to be able to do much but rebound, play some defense and not turn the ball over. If she averages more than 5-6 ppg this season, that would be a bonus but not an expectation. But for her to do this, the Tennessee guards need to play better. Otherwise, with Mercedes on the bench, there will be no easy baskets for the team.
Dunbar...to be honest, I never expected her to play much. She was always in my eyes going to be towards the end of the rotation. If not for the recruiting whiff this season combined with the injuries to Carter and Cooper, I doubt she would have seen anything more than garbage minutes. With the class coming in next year, unless she really distinguishes herself this season, she will be back to the end of the bench with MeMe and Kamara next season.
I agree with you to an extent but part of it is Holly needs to decide how she wants to play and go from there. If the emphasis is to get Russell the ball, then Nunn shouldn't be starting, she should be backing up Russell off the bench (as we saw against ETSU).
At Winthrop she played the 4 but when she post up, the person playing the 5 would go to the high post and they would alternate who goes where. As the odd person out (her and Harris are new to the team) she has to get adjusted to her teammates and that isn't as easy to do when there are (cliques) one the team.
Jordan isn't getting it done at the Point (partially because she is passing up opportunities to score and realistically should probably be transitioned more toward the wing). Holly and her loyalty to her and her undeniable faith in Russell is part of what is killing the team (outside of her inability to coach).
There is a coach on this staff that can relate to this group of players and can get the best out of some of them and I think if Holly sits back and just let certain players play (in a sense) we might see far greater results. Remember last season when she benched herself in a sense at halftime and the players looked extremely dominant under Coach Law. Coach Law also was vital in landing all of the recruits in the 2017 class as well as getting Diamond to change her ways last season.
I am still trying to give her the benefit of the doubt but some coaches are just better off as assistant coaches. It's not saying that she can't coach at all it is simply saying she shouldn't be the person running the show.
I agree with you to an extent but part of it is Holly needs to decide how she wants to play and go from there. If the emphasis is to get Russell the ball, then Nunn shouldn't be starting, she should be backing up Russell off the bench (as we saw against ETSU).
At Winthrop she played the 4 but when she post up, the person playing the 5 would go to the high post and they would alternate who goes where. As the odd person out (her and Harris are new to the team) she has to get adjusted to her teammates and that isn't as easy to do when there are (cliques) one the team.
Jordan isn't getting it done at the Point (partially because she is passing up opportunities to score and realistically should probably be transitioned more toward the wing). Holly and her loyalty to her and her undeniable faith in Russell is part of what is killing the team (outside of her inability to coach).
There is a coach on this staff that can relate to this group of players and can get the best out of some of them and I think if Holly sits back and just let certain players play (in a sense) we might see far greater results. Remember last season when she benched herself in a sense at halftime and the players looked extremely dominant under Coach Law. Coach Law also was vital in landing all of the recruits in the 2017 class as well as getting Diamond to change her ways last season.
I am still trying to give her the benefit of the doubt but some coaches are just better off as assistant coaches. It's not saying that she can't coach at all it is simply saying she shouldn't be the person running the show.