2016 Election Thread Part Deux

#5,301
#5,301
Vol8188 said:
For not being 100% on one of his policies? Can you name every stance of trumps (be careful here, they've probably changed in the last 24 hours)?
Click to expand...

In fairness, Johnson is supposed to be a libertarian, yet, when questioned on the non-aggression principle he becomes lost.
 
#5,302
#5,302
Vol8188 said:
If GJ supports 100% open borders or not, is not the most important policy for me. Just like I couldn't tell you anything about his record on abortion. I think he's pro choice, but I really don't give a ****
Click to expand...

I do like his stance on eliminating the IRS and Dept of Education.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5,303
#5,303
AirVol said:
I do like his stance on eliminating the IRS and Dept of Education.
Click to expand...

Never gonna happen. He may as well be running on a platform of Fridays off, no homework, candy machines in the cafeteria and a longer summer break.

News flash. He's not eliminating the IRS or building a wall.
 
#5,304
#5,304
Septic said:
Never gonna happen. He may as well be running on a platform of Fridays off, no homework, candy machines in the cafeteria and a longer summer break.

News flash. He's not eliminating the IRS or building a wall.
Click to expand...

No worries, I'm not voting Losertarian.
 
#5,307
#5,307
VolsSportsFan said:
But you are voting for a Loser.
Click to expand...

I'm writing in Foghorn Leghorn. Don't call him a loser.

9gXYHeh.png
 
#5,320
#5,320
Grand Vol said:
Let me ask you this...

Do you honestly believe with all your heart as corrupt as the Clinton family is, such rumors are so outlandish one shouldn't be speculative about them?
Click to expand...


I think it's dangerous to cite rumors about politicians as though it was meaningful fact. I recall rumors recently about Cruz affairs. That seemed to go nowhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#5,322
#5,322
lawgator1 said:
I think it's dangerous to cite rumors about politicians as though it was meaningful fact. I recall rumors recently about Cruz affairs. That seemed to go nowhere.
Click to expand...

Which doesn't answer the question.

Do you or do you not think the Clintons are capable of such things?

You've said in the past you believe her to be corrupt and a liar. So either stand by your comments from before or admit you are a partisan hack.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5,323
#5,323
Vol8188 said:
For not being 100% on one of his policies? Can you name every stance of trumps (be careful here, they've probably changed in the last 24 hours)?
Click to expand...

how did you identify me as a Trump supporter? I haven't yet decided who I am voting for, but it won't be for Hillary.

I said busted because you spend about 8 hours a day talking about all the bad things about Donald Trump as if you are changing anyone's mind. Yet when questioned about your own candidate you hypocritically said "I don't know what his position is"
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#5,324
#5,324
lawgator1 said:
I think it's dangerous to cite rumors about politicians as though it was meaningful fact. I recall rumors recently about Cruz affairs. That seemed to go nowhere.
Click to expand...

And I truly wonder how you can dodge the question I asked when you have things like this:

How Clinton Donor Got on Sensitive Intelligence Board - ABC News

Newly released State Department emails help reveal how a major Clinton Foundation donor was placed on a sensitive government intelligence advisory board even though he had no obvious experience in the field, a decision that appeared to baffle the department’s professional staff.

The emails further reveal how, after inquiries from ABC News, the Clinton staff sought to “protect the name” of the Secretary, “stall” the ABC News reporter and ultimately accept the resignation of the donor just two days later.

A prolific fundraiser for Democratic candidates and contributor to the Clinton Foundation, who later traveled with Bill Clinton on a trip to Africa, Rajiv K. Fernando’s only known qualification for a seat on the International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) was his technological know-how. The Chicago securities trader, who specialized in electronic investing, sat alongside an august collection of nuclear scientists, former cabinet secretaries and members of Congress to advise Hillary Clinton on the use of tactical nuclear weapons and on other crucial arms control issues.

Fernando's history of campaign giving dated back at least to 2003 and was prolific -- and almost exclusively to Democrats. He was an early supporter of Hillary Clinton's 2008 bid for president, giving maximum contributions to her campaign, and to HillPAC, in 2007 and 2008. He also served as a fundraising bundler for Clinton, gathering more than $100,000 from others for her White House bid. After Barack Obama bested Clinton for the 2008 nomination, Fernando became a major fundraiser for the Obama campaign. Prior to his State Department appointment, Fernando had given between $100,000 and $250,000 to the William J. Clinton Foundation, and another $30,000 to a political advocacy group, WomenCount, that indirectly helped Hillary Clinton retire her lingering 2008 campaign debts by renting her campaign email list.
Click to expand...
 
#5,325
#5,325
theFallGuy said:
how did you identify me as a Trump supporter? I haven't yet decided who I am voting for, but it won't be for Hillary.

I said busted because you spend about 8 hours a day talking about all the bad things about Donald Trump as if you are changing anyone's mind. Yet when questioned about your own candidate you hypocritically said "I don't know what his position is"
Click to expand...

Are you saying there's no issues of a candidate that are unimportant to you? I said I am not 100% on his abortion policy either, but I don't care either
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top