2016 Election Thread Part Deux

#5,081
#5,081
golfballs said:
2b0f5d8e12e7420f506cae8bc3e1eb27


:pukeb:
Click to expand...
The head on that doesn't even look like it's attached.
 
#5,083
#5,083
I see that Trump picked up the endorsement of Kasich, governor of a key battleground state, and governor of the state hosting the GOP convention.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5,084
#5,084
lawgator1 said:
I see that Trump picked up the endorsement of Kasich, governor of a key battleground state, and governor of the state hosting the GOP convention.
Click to expand...

I see the democrats unifying quickly behind hillary especially bernie and his supporters, nice to see bernie fighting hard to keep loudmouth schultz as head of the dnc
 
Last edited:
#5,086
#5,086
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#5,087
#5,087
Septic said:
Hmm. Bill Clinton was a popular president despite his extracurricular activities. He's also not running again.

Hard to understand why Trump would try to use Bill as a "two of a kind" yardstick. Dumb imo.

I guess it keep the yahoo's talking about anything other than Trumps lack of substance on matters of policy though.

:peace2:
Click to expand...

Hillary has stated that she is going to likely put Bill in some sort of position within her administration. This makes attacking Bill Clinton fair game IMO.

"Mrs. Clinton told voters in Kentucky on Sunday that Mr. Clinton would be “in charge of revitalizing the economy, because, you know, he knows how to do it,” especially “in places like coal country and inner cities.” On a campaign swing this month before the West Virginia primary, she said her husband has “got to come out of retirement and be in charge” of creating jobs."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#5,088
#5,088
theFallGuy said:
Hillary has stated that she is going to likely put Bill in some sort of position within her administration. This makes attacking Bill Clinton fair game IMO.

"Mrs. Clinton told voters in Kentucky on Sunday that Mr. Clinton would be “in charge of revitalizing the economy, because, you know, he knows how to do it,” especially “in places like coal country and inner cities.” On a campaign swing this month before the West Virginia primary, she said her husband has “got to come out of retirement and be in charge” of creating jobs."
Click to expand...

I heard her say the other day Trump wanted to take us back to the past but she is the one openly saying she wants to go back to the 90s.
 
#5,089
#5,089
theFallGuy said:
Hillary has stated that she is going to likely put Bill in some sort of position within her administration. This makes attacking Bill Clinton fair game IMO.

"Mrs. Clinton told voters in Kentucky on Sunday that Mr. Clinton would be “in charge of revitalizing the economy, because, you know, he knows how to do it,” especially “in places like coal country and inner cities.” On a campaign swing this month before the West Virginia primary, she said her husband has “got to come out of retirement and be in charge” of creating jobs."
Click to expand...

No question he's fair game. I just question the wisdom of trying to make Bill out to be a liability. He was (and still is) popular, took a limp economy and turned it around and even left office with a budget running a surplus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#5,090
#5,090
Would be smart of Trump's camp to point out the Clinton's stance on things like DOMA, don't ask don't tell and crime bill they supported when Bill was in office.
 
#5,091
#5,091
Septic said:
No question he's fair game. I just question the wisdom of trying to make Bill out to be a liability. He was (and still is) popular, took a limp economy and turned it around and even left office with a budget running a surplus.
Click to expand...

...and who was Speaker? It's called crossing the aisle to get things done. There's only one side of the aisle for this administration.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#5,093
#5,093
Septic said:
No question he's fair game. I just question the wisdom of trying to make Bill out to be a liability. He was (and still is) popular, took a limp economy and turned it around and even left office with a budget running a surplus.
Click to expand...

I think he's going to go after the trade deals like NAFTA and the Clinton Foundation more than anything.

But you are correct, Bill Clinton is still a fairly popular figure.
 
#5,094
#5,094
jmo but I don't really think Bill wants Hillary to be elected POTUS.
  1. Not sure he's too crazy about being the "first gentleman" of the white house
  2. Don't think he would enjoy taking a back seat to Hillary and seeing her role increase while his continues to decrease
  3. Also doesn't want his legacy as President in any way to possibly be tarnished by Hillary's time in the white house
  4. Lastly... he knows Hillary will have a tight leash on his "extracurricular activities"
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5,095
#5,095
IBlvNTmWrk said:
jmo but I don't really think Bill wants Hillary to be elected POTUS.
  1. Not sure he's too crazy about being the "first gentleman" of the white house
  2. Don't think he would enjoy taking a back seat to Hillary and seeing her role increase while his continues to decrease
  3. Also doesn't want his legacy as President in any way to possibly be tarnished by Hillary's time in the white house
  4. Lastly... he knows Hillary will have a tight leash on his "extracurricular activities"
Click to expand...

I agree with 1-3, on point 4 I dont know why she would start caring now.
 
#5,098
#5,098
AirVol said:
...and who was Speaker? It's called crossing the aisle to get things done. There's only one side of the aisle for this administration.
Click to expand...

You completely miss he point, unless you're suggesting that the speaker of the house is solely responsible for a presidents "administration" and tenure.

Also, Obama's not running for president again, so what does this administration have to do with anything?

Trump trying to drag Bill though the mud is a mistake. We've already hired him and he did a good job by and large.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#5,099
#5,099
Septic said:
You completely miss he point, unless you're suggesting that the speaker of the house is solely responsible for a presidents "administration" and tenure.

Also, Obama's not running for president again, so what does this administration have to do with anything?

Trump trying to drag Bill though the mud is a mistake. We've already hired him and he did a good job by and large.
Click to expand...
I dunno. What did GWB have to do with the last 8 years? According to the libtards, he is responsible for all the country's woes.

And what he is suggesting is that you have to have a president that could reach across the aisle, unlike The Idiot, and a Speaker that would do likewise. The only time this douchebag was successful is when he owned both houses, and look where that got us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#5,100
#5,100
Grand Vol said:
I think he's going to go after the trade deals like NAFTA and the Clinton Foundation more than anything.

But you are correct, Bill Clinton is still a fairly popular figure.
Click to expand...

He can and should look to replace NAFTA.

I think it's ironic that he's accusing HC of selling access to corporations when he's all but admitted to being the one buying access.

Didn't someone call them two sides of the same coin?

Maybe some day we'll get to hear about his policy or hers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top