theFallGuy
I Love the Smell of Napalm In the Morning
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2008
- Messages
- 78,319
- Likes
- 79,479
I do hope you're right.
You make good points. I don't plan on voting, unless some specific issue on the state/county level directly affects me. Alabama will go for trump, Johnson is a charlatan at best imo.You could already see Hillary trying to appeal to Bernie supporters last night. But like VB pointed out in the Hillary thread, it's kind of hard for her to connect with those demanding income equality while wearing a jacket that costs as much as a decent used car.
I see a nice division in the DNC this year. Hillary has to come back towards the center in order to court those voters. And when she does, she'll abandon the waves of new voters that came on board specifically for Bernie. And in a panic, she's reverse positions (again) trying to placate everyone at the same time. And be shown as a fool for it as Trump will eat her alive.
I'm not a Trump supporter and I'm even on the fence about Johnson at this point. I might do a write in (Foghorn here we come) and vote in State and local elections. Trump will get Oklahoma without me.
Blakeman says the FBI has deliberately waited to interview Hillary Clinton until after the primaries because the bureau did not want to interfere with the nominating process. He thinks the FBI is likely to recommend to the Department of Justice whether or not she should be indicted for violating what she says are agency rules and what others call the law between now and the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, which begins July 25.
If she is indicted before the convention, Blakeman says, it will give the party an opportunity to make changes in the rules that could result in an alternate nominee.
Here is the intriguing part about Blakemans scenario: If a grand jury is empaneled, or if she were to be indicted before the convention, the Democrats would have to let her go. If an indictment were to come after the convention, he says, it presents a different problem because each state needs to certify their ballots before November. If an indictment occurs after the states have certified their ballots, it would be nearly impossible to replace Hillary Clinton with another candidate.
Why did you omit the first few paragraphs?
Just curious since they give VERY important context to the rest.
Because as I explained to another poster, I never toss up the entire article. When you have sleezeballs like Righthaven and their ambulance chasing lawyers going after site owners, I learned not to post everything.
If you're complaining about it being "speculation," I omitted the major speculation in the end.
If Trump can keep his yap shut and bring the same message he did last night, he'll bring in the centrist and possibly even some Bernie supporters. You think Republicans dislike Hillary? I think those feeling the Bern hate her even worse.
He would still take more from Trump than from Clinton...either way the country gets screwed
Bernie supporters might vote for the guy that is everything Bernie was fighting against?
I don't see any candidate that will bring in conservative, centrist, and Bernie supporters.
I said some, not a lot. Maybe 10 to 15% at most, but that's a decent number. Remember, Trump is the outsider in all this, just like Bernie is/was. Voting on sheer principle for the outsider isn't a feeling that's specific to the GOP.
That'd be like Cruz supporters voting for Hillary out of spite. Isn't there some liberal outsider they can vote for? Or still write in Bernie?
Honestly I'd be surprised if 0.5% of Bernie supporters voted for Trump.