How about manslaughter then? Because here's the quote from article about the large elephant in the room:
Two people died and the only thing they did was pull his license? And he's eligible to reapply after a year?
This doctor deserves special rights for knowingly operating on patients while under the influence and killing two people, even unintentionally?
It's only silly because you deem it to be silly. The idea was brought forth that no other profession kills people and gets away with it. To which I countered with facts showing the lie of that statement.
You deem it silly because you have no reliable argument to counter the facts of the matter.
LE is the only profession I can think of where they can multiple videos from different angles of two cops murdering a man and not only are they cleared of wrong doing but the profession stands behind them. So you're right... That is pretty f'n interesting.
I didn't say kills people. I said murders people. There's a difference. One which you conveniently ignored while buring my strawman to the ground. For instance, the mentally ill guy the cops executed in Fresno recently. That was murder. There's no one on the planet other than LE that doesn't go to jail for that. But their actions are being, for the most part, defended by the LE community.
So the 12,000 people killed by unnecessary surgery signed off on the "inherently dangerous" nature of medicine? No, they were convinced by a doctor they needed that surgery. And willingly signed off on said surgery because they didn't question the knowledge of said doctor. And paid for that with their life. And did I see 12,000 surgeons going to trial for it?
If you start to put doctors in jail for a misdiagnosis or the wrong prescription, how. many people will be willing to enter the profession?
I think you are wrong.... Our defensive coordinator claims that pressure bursts pipes and that is dealing with a ball game.... Think of the pressure going into a rough neighborhood where 17 murders had been committed in a single weekend.... The ones committing crimes should be punished to the fullest extent of the law but the others should have protections when doing their job.
How mch pressure on on the open heart surgeon that has to operate on GrandVol's relative or close friend that weighs 280 lbs and 60 years old been smoking the previous 45 years of his life? Doctor knows that if GV can't arrest him for murder in the operating room in a criminal court, GV would probably pull him over and shot him in the back as he was drivng away after the civil court case is settled. May even sprinkle some cocaine/loose cigarettes around the doctor's body or bust his tail light to make it justfiable.
Bill would black out police bodycam video for at least a year.
Bill would black out police bodycam videos in Tenn.
Why am I not suprised....
The measure allows public release of recordings that involve an officer's violation of a law enforcement agency's administrative policy or "alleged use of unlawful or unnecessary force in violation of state law or the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States" but only after completion of "any investigation" into the individual case as well as completion of any trial or disciplinary proceeding involving the recording which would take months at minimum and more likely years.
As it will be. But are police required to release all information involving an investigation as soon as they get it?
What makes this any different? Why is it imperative the video be shown before an investigation is complete?
For transparency.
If they have nothing to hide, they have nothing to worry about. Right?
Edited after I quoted.
How about they wait for the investigation to be over before they release any information? It's not like you won't be any less outraged if you have to wait a little longer to see what the bad cop did.
