What I don't understand and maybe a lawyer can help with this question- Clay Travis is presenting a very good question here that NO ONE else is bothering to check- she signed the affidavit saying there was no contact and then several years later there was a completely different story. And those are the docs being presented now as fact in the media. Everyone keeps saying why doesn't Peyton address this but apparently he can't because she will sue him again for the umpteenth time. That doesn't seem fair to me- he is being potentially defamed in the most public way here and IF her version of the story is fabricated in the 03 version compared to the 96 version, can he not sue Her for defamation or purgery or something? Is he supposed to just stay quiet while his reputation is being ruined by the day? It's on people.com now for goodness sake.