2016 Election

Status
Not open for further replies.
#6,054
#6,054
#6,061
#6,061
theFallGuy said:
How is the government "forcing a woman to have a child"? Am I missing something, did they participate in the impregnation of the embryo with a secret agent?
Click to expand...

No you are not missing nothing. You are not seeing clearly out of that dark red goggles.

If a woman is pregnant and the government tells her it is illegal to have an abortion, the government is telling her she has to have that child. Then the same group that tells her she has to have the child tells her to get a job, care for her baby the best way she can, if she couldn't afford it, she should have not got pregnant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#6,062
#6,062
1972 Grad said:
Can you fire them?
Click to expand...
It's hard to know what can be done via EO anymore and what can't. I don't think the Constitution has anything in it that guarantees a gubbamint job to anyone however. I could be wrong. Lawyers will be involved ya know.
 
#6,063
#6,063
Gramps said:
No you are not missing nothing. You are not seeing clearly out of that dark red goggles.

If a woman is pregnant and the government tells her it is illegal to have an abortion, the government is telling her she has to have that child. Then the same group that tells her she has to have the child tells her to get a job, care for her baby the best way she can, if she couldn't afford it, she should have not got pregnant.
Click to expand...

No, I'm not using any goggles. I'm just applying your logic.

Killing a middle school age kid is considered murder. Is the government also forcing a parent to have a middle school child by not allowing them to murder them? SHould they be compensated?
 
#6,064
#6,064
Gramps said:
No you are not missing nothing. You are not seeing clearly out of that dark red goggles.

If a woman is pregnant and the government tells her it is illegal to have an abortion, the government is telling her she has to have that child. Then the same group that tells her she has to have the child tells her to get a job, care for her baby the best way she can, if she couldn't afford it, she should have not got pregnant.
Click to expand...

I figured that is just common sense.
 
#6,067
#6,067
Pentagon guys? Sweet!!! See ya. Thanks for your 20 years. Enjoy your pension. Have fun in the private sector. DC is a fantasy land of cushy government jobs
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#6,068
#6,068
Obsessed said:
Yet, these women get 6-7 abortions. Personal responsibilities has to come in play sometime.
Click to expand...

What about the women that use it once because the BC failed or they were raped? Should they be prohibited because other may abuse the right?

Maybe one that hits a little closer to home... should I be deprived of the right to own a gun because others may abuse the rights afforded them?

Let's not get into the constitutional issue and just address the personal responsibility aspect because that is the argument you have raised against abortion and that is the aspect that is being harped on by the left as it relates to gun ownership.
 
#6,071
#6,071
theFallGuy said:
No, I'm not using any goggles. I'm just applying your logic.

Killing a middle school age kid is considered murder. Is the government also forcing a parent to have a middle school child by not allowing them to murder them? SHould they be compensated?
Click to expand...

A fetus, prior to certain age, cannot survive outside the womb. A middle schooler can. Your logic breaks down at that distinction.
 
#6,072
#6,072
theFallGuy said:
No, I'm not using any goggles. I'm just applying your logic.

Killing a middle school age kid is considered murder. Is the government also forcing a parent to have a middle school child by not allowing them to murder them? SHould they be compensated?
Click to expand...


You are not applying my logic in any way, period and you know you aren't.
 
#6,074
#6,074
ClearwaterVol said:
What about the women that use it once because the BC failed or they were raped? Should they be prohibited because other may abuse the right?

Maybe one that hits a little closer to home... should I be deprived of the right to own a gun because others may abuse the rights afforded them?

Let's not get into the constitutional issue and just address the personal responsibility aspect because that is the argument you have raised against abortion and that is the aspect that is being harped on by the left as it relates to gun ownership.
Click to expand...

What happens to someone when they use a gun irresponsibly?

Are you suggesting that people who use abortion irresponsible should go to prison too?
 
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top