If we can have cars that will be driving us all around while we watch the 15th installment of "Rocky" on our tech screens in another decade or two, I fail to see how we can't make well-adapted tech that can shot a damn gun when we need. Smart gun manufacturers already recommend you change the batteries every five years or so. I know how we don't like extra burdens, but just change the darn battery when the battery needs to be changed. We do the same thing with a car. And it's more likely that a net-loss of lives will be prevented by this than those who die in a malfunction, when their gun is needed, which will probably rarely, if ever, occur.
I'm only against requiring "smart" gun technology. If there is a market for the tech, by all means I hope the manufactures' fill the need.
I put smart in quotation marks because anything that will delay the use of a gun during a time of need isn't smart.
was he really crying and if so, about what - what was the context?
he had some perfectly timed tears right when he mentions Newtown. I'm surprised he didn't have any kid props up on stage with him
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfCQWSKeWUE
So much "if" here.
I guarantee the default in smart cars is if there is any problem in the circuitry, power, etc the car is to shutdown, stop. Systems have overrides for safety.
Does your thumb print reader on you iphone work every time? Hell no. Does you bluetooth ever drop the signal or not pair correctly? Hell yes.
So what is the life saving of the "smart gun" - preventing unauthorized use? What about the non-smart 300 million guns? What about hacks to jail break them.
To me this is feel-good fantasy land.
So much "if" here.
I guarantee the default in smart cars is if there is any problem in the circuitry, power, etc the car is to shutdown, stop. Systems have overrides for safety.
Does your thumb print reader on you iphone work every time? Hell no. Does you bluetooth ever drop the signal or not pair correctly? Hell yes.
So what is the life saving of the "smart gun" - preventing unauthorized use? What about the non-smart 300 million guns? What about hacks to jail break them.
To me this is feel-good fantasy land.
I'll go back to the policy advocated by Hndg - punish illegal gun sales severely. Put enforcement efforts into identifying and prosecuting them. This would do much more than any of the proposed new regulations.
So now someone defending themselves could have a really literal "blue screen of death"?
I'll make a deal with all the "smart gun" supporters. When the tech reaches a point of reliability where all government agents are carrying weapons of that type (including the secret service) I'll consider the concept pretty well vetted. Until then, no thanks.
It is indeed an interesting proposal actually. I have recently heard that there is a proposal to make primers that have a shelf life. The supposition is that it will stop stockpiling of ammo. What happens when you go to defend yourself and the gun doesn't work because of dead batteries or bad ammo. I guess you just die. Too bad so sad.If we can have cars that will be driving us all around while we watch the 15th installment of "Rocky" on our tech screens in another decade or two, I fail to see how we can't make well-adapted tech that can shot a damn gun when we need. Smart gun manufacturers already recommend you change the batteries every five years or so. I know how we don't like extra burdens, but just change the darn battery when the battery needs to be changed. We do the same thing with a car. And it's more likely that a net-loss of lives will be prevented by this than those who die in a malfunction, when their gun is needed, which will probably rarely, if ever, occur.
It is indeed an interesting proposal actually. I have recently heard that there is a proposal to make primers that have a shelf life. The supposition is that it will stop stockpiling of ammo. What happens when you go to defend yourself and the gun doesn't work because of dead batteries or bad ammo. I guess you just die. Too bad so sad.
Again, this is about the big picture, which includes deaths from accidents, some suicides (certainly not all), and prevention of crimes from gun theft. This is not just about being able to defend oneself in a Wild West shootout, which, while an unfortunate reality, occurs I imagine much less frequently than the others enumerated.
I'm not aware of every man, woman, and child having a gun in public. If they did, I would imagine things would be much safer.
I am being big picture...if the tech isn't vetted enough to be carried by LEO and government agents then it's not good enough for me.
And that's not even playing any remotely conspiratorial angles...think OnStar.
And as an aside you do know the whole "wild west" thing is almost entirely a fictional entertainment creation, right?