Benghazi committee

#26
#26
The American people are not fooled.

Despite those concerns, 72% of all Americans say they see the Benghazi committee as mostly using its investigative mission for political gain, just 23% think it is conducting an objective investigation. Even Republicans are skeptical on this measure, with 49% saying the committee is trying to score political points vs. 47% who say it is conducting an objective investigation. Among Democrats, 85% see it as seeking political advantage and among independents that stands at 75%.


Benghazi hearing: Poll: 3-in-4 say panel is political - CNNPolitics.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#30
#30
I might well vote for Kasich or Bush over her.

But that doesn't mean I can't see what this committee is all about. What a farce!
Your head is so far up the democratic party's ass you can see hillarys pantsuit.

And you say that bullchit about Bush or Kasich because you know damned good and well neither is a viable candidate.

troll.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#31
#31
Gowdy ' s snide opening remarks leaving zero doubt this committee is a partisan sham.

how many stupid threads are you going to make about Benghazi? I thought you were sick of hearing about it and it wasn't an issue
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#32
#32
how many stupid threads are you going to make about Benghazi? I thought you were sick of hearing about it and it wasn't an issue


This thread is not about Benghazi.

This thread is about the Benghazi committee, which was agreed to by Boehner to placate the Tea Party so they could pass the debt ceiling measure. Its about a committee which was created by people who CLAIM they are against government waste, then wasting close to $5 million. Its about a political party so broken, so dysfunctional, that it cannot control its off-the-reservation fringe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#33
#33
This thread is not about Benghazi.

This thread is about the Benghazi committee, which was agreed to by Boehner to placate the Tea Party so they could pass the debt ceiling measure. Its about a committee which was created by people who CLAIM they are against government waste, then wasting close to $5 million. Its about a political party so broken, so dysfunctional, that it cannot control its off-the-reservation fringe.

speaking of off-the-reservation fringe, now that Biden is out will Elizabeth "Fauxcahontas" Warren throw her hat..er, headdress into the ring?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#34
#34
speaking of off-the-reservation fringe, now that Biden is out will Elizabeth "Fauxcahontas" Warren throw her hat..er, headdress into the ring?


No, I think that predictions that it would be HRC,with mild resistance, were right all along.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#38
#38
This is the eighth committee, the 33rd hearing, and there have been 11 published reports coming form all of that, ALL of it concluding that there was no wrong doing, no ignoring of emergency calls, etc. Defect in the way security requests were handled beforehand? Yes, and those have been addressed. But some sort of malfeasance that night? Zilch to support that claim.

So $4.7 million by this committee alone, which has been sitting for 17 months, longer than any prior select committee, including Watergate. Hmmmmm.

Ask yourself this one question -- and try as hard as it may be -- to be honest. If HRC was not running for President, isn't it a fact that this committee would have been concluded long ago?

You know it is. If you deny that, you are simply lying to yourself.

When in the hell did you or anyone on the left start caring about how much money the government spends?
 
#40
#40
This thread is not about Benghazi.

This thread is about the Benghazi committee, which was agreed to by Boehner to placate the Tea Party so they could pass the debt ceiling measure. Its about a committee which was created by people who CLAIM they are against government waste, then wasting close to $5 million. Its about a political party so broken, so dysfunctional, that it cannot control its off-the-reservation fringe.

:eek:hmy:
1396489816894.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#41
#41
So she says she didnt even have a computer in her office..How on earth did this "lady" conduct business in the 21st century? And people want her to be president?

I see a bunch of shovel ready jobs on her agenda! First up its time to get those telegraph poles back up! Revive the Pony Express! Go green with a new horse carriage made from sustainable farmed materials!
 
#50
#50
Sydney Blumenthal had HRC private email address and her diplomats in dangerous parts of the world did not. Damaging.

I know that my girlfriend has my private email address, my clients do not. They get ahold of me through business channels.

Am I doing something wrong?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Advertisement

Back
Top