Just out of curiosity, but what makes you think he would automatically just come in and out recruit guys like Saban, Miles and Richt? Just because of his name? I think it would take much more than that to out recruit the SEC.
I was all in on the Gruden train after Dooley was relieved of his duties. By all in I mean it was Gruden or else for me. I've cooled off of that and would be open for others (NOT named Mullen, Whittingham, Cutcliffe, Kingsbury, Fuentes) but still think Gruden would still be a top notch choice. Here's why:
# 1 - His "name" - Now I don't want just a popularity contest winner as a coach but I believe his name (due to football camps, TV appearances, tenure in the profession, etc.) would be a huge attraction. You got to have something to draw them in, right? I believe it would tend to make recruits excited and less likely to leave a commitment and less likely for existing players to transfer out. Sure, you're going to have decommitments and transfers but I believe it would be extremely minimal in losing guys while at the same time building onto them with the "best of the best".
# 2 - His "staff" - Again, I think due to all of his connections and involvement in the profession I truly believe he could put together "the best staff in America". His name alone is not enough for this program. Shoot, if Gruden couldn't bring in a staff at least equal to Kiffin's then I say no thank you to Gruden. I would be as excited about the entire staff that Gruden could bring as I would about Gruden himself. Once the players are in you gotta have something to keep them here and keep them coming, right? I believe his staff would be the answer to that and also for positive "on-field" results like truly competing for SEC Championships and putting us in position for playoff consideration on a yearly basis. None of this, "I think we go 8-4 or 9-3 and get 2nd in the SEC East" only to find out it's "Crap, we need to go 6-6 or we will miss a bowl" like it is nowadays.
I think of Gruden's impact similar to Carroll's impact at USC. Not the same in all regards but I think the "success" and "results" could be the similar, if not better.
I think it's going to take a huge name that can 1) coach/recruit himself and 2) bring in a top, top echelon staff that can do the same to ever bring us out of the cess pool of mediocrity that this administration has settled for over the last decade.
The biggest question is will the administration/donors pay top dollar for what it will take to do that or will they continue to go cheap? If they continue to go cheap then I think you can confidently lower your expectations of this program to be a middle of the road SEC East team year in and year out.