LouderVol
Extra and Terrestrial
- Joined
- May 19, 2014
- Messages
- 59,231
- Likes
- 60,238
Not really related to your post, but only slightly.
What do you think 3-D printing means for the future of architecture and construction?
What happened here?
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F53DfUwVfkU[/youtube]
any Nuland sightings?
That renewed Cold War-style emphasis, and the Marines saw Black Sea Rotational Force pick up several training missions across Eastern Europe. Over the past six months, they completed nine major exercises and 46 military-to-military engagements. That is compared to just six exercises and 22 military-to-military engagements, during the previous rotation.
The next rotation of Marines will be even busier. They already have seven scheduled exercises, and 45 military-to-military engagements, with the possibility of more to come.
Just wondering if there are any circumstances in which a pilot could still land one? Or is it doomed?
the guy with the bug name explained it way better than I could, he probably actually knows what he is talking about. sounds like he was saying that the pilot might have been trying to land in a "controlled freefall" so to speak. doesn't sound like it has a high probability of survival.
I about jumped out of my couch, reading this one.
haha!
I've asked Plecoptera before about his name and his avatar.
Sadly, I cannot remember his response.
Plecoptera, help us out.
I'm an aquatic biologist.
But on a host of other important issues, the NSC, designed in Harry Trumans time to coordinate sometimes-conflicting diplomatic and defense views, is still widely seen as the place where policy becomes immobilized by indecision, plodding through months and sometimes years of repetitive White House meetings.
In addressing challenges where there is internal disagreement or there are no good options civil war in Syria, Russians in Ukraine and military dictatorship in Egypt, for example policymaking has been sclerotic at best, constipated at worse, a senior Defense Department official said.
Time seems to be all this process produces. More time, more meetings, more discussions, the official said.
. . .
Outside the administration, some lawmakers, policy experts and scholars charge that a bloated NSC staff, filled with what they describe as acolytes who distrust the rest of the government and see protecting the president as their primary job, has helped make Obamas foreign policy ineffective and risk-averse.
