Iran deal unlikely: what's next?

#255
#255
"Iran will only grant very limited access to international inspectors to visit nuclear sites. They will be allowed one visit to the military site at Parchin, and visits to other sites will be tightly controlled, with a 24-day advance warning, according to reports. If Iran refuses access, the issue will be arbitrated by a Joint Commission, on which Iran will also be represented. Sanctions can only be re-imposed for “significant non-performance.”

24 day advance warning LOL. What a joke
 
#256
#256
theFallGuy said:
"Iran will only grant very limited access to international inspectors to visit nuclear sites. They will be allowed one visit to the military site at Parchin, and visits to other sites will be tightly controlled, with a 24-day advance warning, according to reports. If Iran refuses access, the issue will be arbitrated by a Joint Commission, on which Iran will also be represented. Sanctions can only be re-imposed for “significant non-performance.”

24 day advance warning LOL. What a joke
Click to expand...

Tough restrictions..............but what were we to do
 
#259
#259
theFallGuy said:
"Iran will only grant very limited access to international inspectors to visit nuclear sites. They will be allowed one visit to the military site at Parchin, and visits to other sites will be tightly controlled, with a 24-day advance warning, according to reports. If Iran refuses access, the issue will be arbitrated by a Joint Commission, on which Iran will also be represented. Sanctions can only be re-imposed for “significant non-performance.”

24 day advance warning LOL. What a joke
Click to expand...


Where is this coming from? If its one of your usual sources, I question its accuracy. Breitbart? Drudge?

Its telling that you don't provide the source for your claim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#260
#260
lawgator1 said:
Where is this coming from? If its one of your usual sources, I question its accuracy. Breitbart? Drudge?

Its telling that you don't provide the source for your claim.
Click to expand...

Quick google search, over a dozen different sites on first page..
 
#261
#261
Iran is the ONLY peaceful nation in the middle east.....guess why? No American influence

Wake the hell up!!!
 
#265
#265
In 2007, when he was beginning his run for president, Senator Obama told a conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) that “the world must work to stop Iran’s uranium-enrichment program.” On October 22, 2012, during a presidential debate with Mitt Romney, Mr Obama said: “Our goal is to get Iran to recognize it needs to give up its nuclear program and abide by the U.N. resolutions that have been in place. . . . But the deal we’ll accept is — they end their nuclear program. It’s very straightforward.” EDITORIAL: Don’t Try Trusting Iran In December 2013 at a Brookings Foundation forum, President Obama said: “They don’t need to have an underground, fortified facility like Fordow in order to have a peaceful nuclear program. They certainly don’t need a heavy-water reactor at Arak in order to have a peaceful nuclear program. They don’t need some of the advanced centrifuges that they currently possess.” This is what the president said about the Iran nuclear program to get elected. This is what the president told the American people to reassure them about the Iran talks. The agreement announced today does not come close to meeting these statements and promises.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/421191/iran-deal-nuclear-agreement-obama-betrayal
 
#270
#270
@ErinBurnett: "We never sought anytime/anywhere inspections" - Pres Obama Dpty National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes tells me.


What? He didn't even ask? #TheWorst
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#274
#274
Rand Paul: Nuclear Iran Not a Threat to U.S., Israel | Washington Free Beacon

Sen. Rand Paul (R., Ky.) denied that a nuclear Iran would pose a national security threat to the United States or Israel in a 2007 radio interview with talk show host and conspiracy theorist Alex Jones.

“Even our own intelligence community consensus opinion now is that they’re not a threat. Like my dad [Rep. Ron Paul] says, [the Iranians] don’t have an Air Force, they don’t have a Navy,” said Paul, according to a recording of the interview. “You know, it’s ridiculous to think they’re a threat to our national security.”
Click to expand...
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top