I would suggest that its all about context in re comparison to Dooley.
Dooley lost more games than his predecessor in year one, and less again than he did in year one in year 2. Dooley was also 11-14, where Jones is 11-13 with one game pending. Jones could very well end this year 12-13, which is, in fact, NOT the same record as Dooley.
Jones, on the other hand, won the same number of raw games as his predecessor in year one, but doubled the amount of SEC wins, and had a win over a ranked opponent. Dooley played 5 ranked opponents in his final year to Jones's 7 in his first. They had the same win loss total but Jones had the harder schedule.
In year two, Jones added another SEC win, bringing his total to five, or the exact number of SEC wins in two years that Dooley had in 3.
Not only that, but in relation to talent, at this point Dooley was seven games below what talent predicted if you count the bowl game. Jones is 4 games (Saban is 3 below over the same time period). 2 games a year is within the standard deviation of performance in relation to talent. Jones's two game under-performance this year also puts him in the same performance category as Malzahn, Sumlin and Miles.
If one actually accepts the argument that the records are the same with one game left to be played, this is a case of where being 'the same' is not analogous to 'equal.'