BornToBleedOrange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 14, 2009
- Messages
- 1,535
- Likes
- 747
Lo,l ya right... Keep thinking that pal
I usually don't read your posts since you are on ignore, but I looked at this one and am now quite concerned...
You aren't saying that you think recruiting services are better talent evaluators than a college coaching staff, right? That would quite possibly be the most idiotic thing I have ever heard in my life.
Yep.
It's like which came first...bamers or inbreeding?
Butch's eval of Woody Quinn agrees with you. Same for Dooley's eval of pretty much his whole team
Minor point here. These two statements are not congruent. To say a statement like "stars definitely matter", one would need to provide evidence that there is a causal relationship between star ranking and success. Clearly no one is attempting to draw that distinction. A more appropriate conclusion would be like "There is a strong positive correlation between stars and performance which suggests that stars are a strong indicator for future performance.
As I am still somewhat new, I liked it because of the inferences following the post and the other four likes that the post already had. I am assuming there is some strong reason that I should like, like the smiley, especially in regards to Shy Tuttle...