VolunteerHillbilly
Spike Drinks, Not Trees
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2005
- Messages
- 40,791
- Likes
- 15,246
nice post. any idea where i can get a list of martin's recruits since 2011?
Good points. I think Martin's biggest fault was taking questionable recruits too early in the process. By questionable, I mean their talent level.
He seems to have learned from this. We are getting guys that are more highly recruited and have more ability along with some nice offers.
I think he needs to get guys that fit what he wants to do but there's guys in the top 100 and top 50 that fit his system as well. He needs to land some of those as well. I know he got stokes and Hubbs but there's been a big gap between them and our other recruits.
All that said, I'm happy with the incoming class. I think Cofer and Austin are going to be really good for us. I think Cornish is going to be better than expected as well. I don't know much about Turman as of yet but I've heard good things. All these guys will be nice players at UT.
I think you've got to give him a pass on the first class, because it was thrown together last minute. The fact that he managed to sign a 5* athlete like Richardson is impressive.
I'm also not saying that stars can't play in Martin's system. Glenn Robinson played in this system and ended up as the number 1 draft pick. That being said, Robinson fit the system incredibly well. Same goes for Robbie Hummel, Etwaun Moore, JaJuan Johnson, etc. They were all top recruits who also fit the system. The general Purdue system involves one good scorer on the perimeter, one good scorer in the post, and a team full of great defenders. First team to 65 wins. I know it's not exciting all the time, but it can be effective.
Just a few schools that have had top 10-15 or so recruiting classes most every year since 2000, when they have need to sign multiple players.
Kentucky, Florida, UConn, Memphis, Duke, Texas, Michigan State, Kansas, North Carolina, Michigan, Louisville, Indiana, Syracuse, Ohio State, Arizona, Georgetown, Indiana, Maryland.
Those schools have won the national championship 14 of the last 14 seasons. Those schools filled 42 out of 56 spots in the final 4 since 2000.
When recruiting fell off, like at Maryland, they dipped. Where it remains steady, Kentucky, Florida, North Carolina, Duke, Michigan State, they have multiple Final Fours.
Anyone selling that recruiting stars don't matter that much in basketball, is selling a bill of goods.
I think stars are more important in basketball than in football. In basketball, you bring in 2-3 studs, and you can flip a program in one season.
Very important in basketball, we should look no further than our own team in the impact that Stokes and Jordan made this year.
Michigan struggled for a long while, but signed two top 12 recruiting classes in the last few years per 247 and they're going pretty well right now.
Recruiting high level players is vital in CBB if you want to compete for titles with any consistency.
It is very possible that Martin (if he returns) will have Stokes, Hubbs, and Richardson on the floor next year. Those 3 are all of his recruits. Stokes and Hubbs are both 5* players, and Richardson has proven to be a 5* talent. That isn't poor recruiting in my opinion.
Stokes returning is the most important element for next season along with CCM being at the helm. You gotta think this team has gained much from this tourney run. Also, CCM has recruited high profile individuals, just hasn't closed the deal on some. This can change when recruits see you dancing to the sweet sixteen. What may hurt our recruiting is some in our very own fan base. Case in point Justice.