- Joined
- Nov 23, 2012
- Messages
- 77,876
- Likes
- 115,718
While we've been having such wonderful conversations about theology, evolution, grading, and public schools, what about the proposed law's constitutionality? This seems like the base practical matter, from which all the other concerns should then spring. I just don't see how it's constitutional. I'm not talking about students discussing their faith in class or in assignments; I'm talking about students being authorized to usurp announcements, school functions (that are not voluntary), etc. and turn them into some sort of camp revivals. Regardless of whether or not it's non-denominational or interfaith, I still don't see how this is legal.
Specifically what is Unconstitutional about it? The mixing of church and state? Already addressed:
.The policy would also require the LEA to:
(4) State that the student's speech does not reflect the endorsement, sponsorship, position, or expression of the LEA. This disclaimer would be provided at all graduation ceremonies and would be provided at any other event in which a student speaks publicly for as long as a need exists to dispel confusion over the LEA's nonsponsorship of the student's speech
If anything, it upholds a student's Right to free speech.
