Martin has EARNED an extension and a raise

Yes, that team did not squeak into the tournament like this one. This team has been hard to watch, this program under Martin has been hard to watch. Texas a&m twice or vandy games ring a bell to you? This team is more talented than that sweet 16 team

So to be clear....you WERE impressed with barely beating 11 seed SDSU by 3 and then getting to play 14 seed Ohio because they upset 3 seed Georgetown? You didn't piss and moan about how they didn't beat anyone to get there?

Are you seriously going with this?
 
Oh please...He isn't even a pimple on Pearl's rear end...He is having this one run and all of a sudden you believe he deserves a big raise?...Really?....REALLY???

Yeah. Because it isn't like this run happened in December. It happeded in March, when it matters. Furthermore, if we don't pony up, somebody else will. So, unless you want to start over with another flavor of the week bargain coach, I'd suggest you come around to the idea that he's about to get paid whether you agree with it or not.
 
I will be back in here it they beat Mich, will you all if they lose? Oh and next year will be tons of fun we will see if the bowing down to the great Martin continues.
 
that 2010 team had some really bad losses too didn't they?

They were a 6 seed. They didn't squeak in but it wasn't like they were world beaters either. They got destroyed by a bad Southern Cal team, lost to Georgia, and got hammered by 30 by UK in the SECT.
 
I will be back in here it they beat Mich, will you all if they lose? Oh and next year will be tons of fun we will see if the bowing down to the great Martin continues.

I've never left, you're the one who only shows up to complain. Which is what you'll do if we beat Michigan.
 
So to be clear....you WERE impressed with barely beating 11 seed SDSU by 3 and then getting to play 14 seed Ohio because they upset 3 seed Georgetown? You didn't piss and moan about how they didn't beat anyone to get there?

Are you seriously going with this?

I was not sweating it out on selection Sunday for that team, they were safely in. This team barely squeaked in. This team was far too talented to barely make it in and to lose to some of the teams they did.
 
I've never left, you're the one who only shows up to complain. Which is what you'll do if we beat Michigan.

Nope I am enjoying the run and are happy for the players, they are very talented. I am just not going to pretend the Martin era started last Thursday unlike you all I remember all 3 years, not just 3 games, they are winning in spite of not because of Martin
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I was not sweating it out on selection Sunday for that team, they were safely in. This team barely squeaked in. This team was far too talented to barely make it in and to lose to some of the teams they did.

Oh so you admit it has nothing to do with who they beat, you're going to piss and moan no matter what.

That 2010 didn't beat ANYONE (according to your standards) before they beat OSU. So why impressed with that, but with Martin suddenly they beat "no one"?

Hey let's try the 2008 team now. You impressed with that tournament run? Beat a 15, barely beat a 7, got destroyed by a 3 seed. That impressive to you?
 
They were a 6 seed. They didn't squeak in but it wasn't like they were world beaters either. They got destroyed by a bad Southern Cal team, lost to Georgia, and got hammered by 30 by UK in the SECT.

pretty sure they were a 9 seed
 
Shall we discuss B.P.'s NCAA tournament runs:


05-06' 22 -8 #2 seed - beat #15 Winthrop 63-61 lost to #7 Wichita ST

06' 07' - 24-11 #4 seed - beat #12 Long Beach - Beat #5 UVA - Lost to #1 OSU

07' -08' 31-5 #2 seed - beat #15 American - beat#7 Butler in OT - blown out by #3 Louisville

08' - 09' 21-13 #9 seed - lost to #8 seed O.S.U.

09- 10' 28-9 #6 seed - beat # 11 San Diego St. - Beat #14 Ohio - Beat #1 - Ohio St. Lost to # 5 M.S.U.

10-11' 19-15 #9 seed - lost to # 8 Michigan

So, that means BP did the following

Beat 7 teams seeded below U.T.
Beat 1 team seeded higher than U.T.

Lost to 2 teams seeded below U.T.
Lost to 4 teams seeded above U.T.

So, only one upset in his entire tenure. It looks like Martin has tied his # of upsets all ready and he's only been to 1 tournament.
 
They got blistered by USC by about 22, and lost to UGA by double digits, swept by Vandy, and hammered by UK in the SEC tourney.

This team, lost to UTEP, NC st, A&m twice, vandy, 26 point lose to Florida where they scored a blistering 41 points. So what's your point about that team?
 
Shall we discuss B.P.'s NCAA tournament runs:


05-06' 22 -8 #2 seed - beat #15 Winthrop 63-61 lost to #7 Wichita ST

06' 07' - 24-11 #4 seed - beat #12 Long Beach - Beat #5 UVA - Lost to #1 OSU

07' -08' 31-5 #2 seed - beat #15 American - beat#7 Butler in OT - blown out by #3 Louisville

08' - 09' 21-13 #9 seed - lost to #8 seed O.S.U.

09- 10' 28-9 #6 seed - beat # 11 San Diego St. - Beat #14 Ohio - Beat #1 - Ohio St. Lost to # 5 M.S.U.

10-11' 19-15 #9 seed - lost to # 8 Michigan

So, that means BP did the following

Beat 7 teams seeded below U.T.
Beat 1 team seeded higher than U.T.

Lost to 2 teams seeded below U.T.
Lost to 4 teams seeded above U.T.

So, only one upset in his entire tenure. It looks like Martin has tied his # of upsets all ready and he's only been to 1 tournament.

Which is my point, justin threw down his terms on, and if he's going by them, he should have been impressed with basically 1 Pearl NCAAT run.

But we know that's not true.
 
Shall we discuss B.P.'s NCAA tournament runs:


05-06' 22 -8 #2 seed - beat #15 Winthrop 63-61 lost to #7 Wichita ST

06' 07' - 24-11 #4 seed - beat #12 Long Beach - Beat #5 UVA - Lost to #1 OSU

07' -08' 31-5 #2 seed - beat #15 American - beat#7 Butler in OT - blown out by #3 Louisville

08' - 09' 21-13 #9 seed - lost to #8 seed O.S.U.

09- 10' 28-9 #6 seed - beat # 11 San Diego St. - Beat #14 Ohio - Beat #1 - Ohio St. Lost to # 5 M.S.U.

10-11' 19-15 #9 seed - lost to # 8 Michigan

So, that means BP did the following

Beat 7 teams seeded below U.T.
Beat 1 team seeded higher than U.T.

Lost to 2 teams seeded below U.T.
Lost to 4 teams seeded above U.T.

So, only one upset in his entire tenure. It looks like Martin has tied his # of upsets all ready and he's only been to 1 tournament.

So let's discuss Martins, tourney runs prior to these 3 games. I will start.







I can't find the stats, perhaps you could help me and provide them?
 
This team, lost to UTEP, NC st, A&m twice, vandy, 26 point lose to Florida where they scored a blistering 41 points. So what's your point about that team?

You care to admit you have a huge double standard when it comes to being "impressed" with NCAAT wins?

WTF does it matter if they barely got in or not? You're the one who set the standard as to what impresses you about NCAAT wins, and by those said standards, you should have been pissing and moaning about Pearl not "beating anyone".

But we know you didn't do that.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top