Agree with this. Plus he has the ability to throw on the run, which may be required playing behind a first year offensive line.
And I never thought I'd see the day that we lose to Vandy in back to back years. Where have you been?
I think it's pretty easy to see that UT, had we not been playing with an erratic (and rumored to be injured) true FR QB and without North for most of the game... we wouldn't lose.
With that said, we won't be playing Utah State with a shaky and erratic True Freshman QB and without North. We'll also have added Pearson and Malone at WR.
Not to mention we'll have our best LB back.
Or we can hyperbole if you want. The sky is literally falling after all.
I have a feeling the O line is going to surprise a lot of folks this year and be decent by SEC standards.
I do too despite that last post. One concern for me tho is their discipline on snap counts. Hopefully a LOT of repetitions in the spring and fall will keep this from being an issue.
We can't afford to be starting 1st and 15 on drives.
We can't overlook Vandy trying to give the game away with all those fumbles, plus losing their entire secondary and starting RB..... the QB playing on a torn ACL.....
They played like crap and still beat us. That's what hurts the most to me.