CNCVol88
Local Band Nerd
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2012
- Messages
- 5,802
- Likes
- 6,036
Does a barren women possess the correct organs to have a child?
Are you seriously this stupid?
Now that's not what you said is it? Who's the stupid one? That's a rhetorical question just to help you out.
So women who have had surgery to remove certain organs aren't women?
You can go ahead and add more stipulations to fit your agenda. She's a chick now, but I fail to see where any of her rights were trampled on.
In just responding to your requirements you posted. I understand you're a scientist and all so I suppose I should just yield to your extensive research on the subject....... Still a chick.Wow. lol: whatever you say man. DNA and basic human physiology says he is a man. Learn to educate yourself before you try to make asinine and ignorant arguments.
Here is a little physiology lesson, if you can understand it. A woman who has had her reproductive organs removed is still a woman. Before the removal, she possessed the necessary organs to bear a child. Her DNA would indicate that she is a female.
A man who undergoes a sex change operation only undergoes physical and hormonal changes. This "chick" NEVER possessed Fallopian tubes, a cervix, a uterus or ovaries. His DNA would indicate him as male.
This guy is only a chick to society. In reality he is a male. Jesus man this is simple stuff.
In just responding to your requirements you posted. I understand you're a scientist and all so I suppose I should just yield to your extensive research on the subject....... Still a chick.