The source of the Cohen tape info

[Squints]

Your post with or without context does nothing to alleviate that you attributed a personal belief, without evidence, to a third of all American's.

This is the crux of the argument and specifically why you keep failing. You, not I, need address your hasty generalization and just own it. I'm a bit amazed that after a half dozen failed attempts you'd circle back around to your own words. Breathtaking stupidity. I don't feel like you tried all of the other available options. Was "Obama's fault" on loan and unavailable? That one's a staple when all else fails...

Lastly, was that parting shot an attempt at a penis size roast? Is that what you've been reduced to? Embarrassingly terrible execution. I can't decide if I should pity you or keep dragging your terrible argument through the mud.

Luckily, your inability to accept your mistake will make that determination for you.

For the last time, turd tank, I didn’t misspeak, mischaracterize or misattribute, you’ve just yet to refute what I said, with any substantiation.

Instead of addressing what I said, you’ve been the one changing the argument to your own detriment, you just refuse to see it, thus, you lash out with coded remarks about my inability to see your argument.

I told you this from the start, your argument is not my argument, but you refused and mired yourself deeper into the abyss of feces.

Either address my argument contextually, or move on. This really isn’t that hard.

 

[Septic]

You've overplayed your "troll" card here and are no longer making any sense.

Squints wins. Flawless victory.

Back to Disney.com kid, you arent ready.

 

[Grand Vol]

Yes, briefly. Followed by five decades of promoting civil rights. You should do independent research on Byrd before hitching your wagon to the idea that Byrd was lynching people.

It's as stupid and ill-informed as trying to make the case that Trump is a progressive liberal because he said he was a Democrat decades ago.

That is unless context doesn't matter and Facebook memes are now irrefutable sources of facts.

I will say that oftentimes there is a lot of hypocrisy within that realm as one can be demonized for something they did decades ago and others held up for emulation.

Paula Deen for example. Admitted to using a racial slur decades prior, vilified.

Robert Byrd, a member of the KKK during a time when they were pretty much out of control where minority rights were concerned, now considered a civil rights hero.

Political party does matter when discussing such things.

 

[Septic]

I will say that oftentimes there is a lot of hypocrisy within that realm as one can be demonized for something they did decades ago and others held up for emulation.

Paula Deen for example. Admitted to using a racial slur decades prior, vilified.

Robert Byrd, a member of the KKK during a time when they were pretty much out of control where minority rights were concerned, now considered a civil rights hero.

Political party does matter when discussing such things.

I agree to a point. I'm not sure there is a comparable bad example as holding Byrd out as some modern day skin head. Other than partisan shots across the bow, I don't see that one political party has a monopoly of exposing the other for bad behavior.

 

[DC_Vol]

I will say that oftentimes there is a lot of hypocrisy within that realm as one can be demonized for something they did decades ago and others held up for emulation.

Paula Deen for example. Admitted to using a racial slur decades prior, vilified.

Robert Byrd, a member of the KKK during a time when they were pretty much out of control where minority rights were concerned, now considered a civil rights hero.

Political party does matter when discussing such things.

Of course it does. The outrage machine is driven by a cycle that includes the MSM and SJWs on social media. When it's a Democrat, the machine rarely gets out of first gear.

 

[Septic]

Of course it does. The outrage machine is driven by a cycle that includes the MSM and SJWs on social media. When it's a Democrat, the machine rarely gets out of first gear.

For a self described socialist democrat, (that was you wasn't it?) You sure do have a short memory. Where were you from 2008 to 2016?

 

[Grand Vol]

I agree to a point. I'm not sure there is a comparable bad example as holding Byrd out as some modern day skin head.

I was merely pointing out the hypocrisy of the matter. But let's not consider Byrd as being some icon of civil rights either as he's portrayed in some circles. He was far from it but the (D) behind his name gave him a pass on a lot of things.

 

[DC_Vol]

For a self described socialist democrat, (that was you wasn't it?) You sure do have a short memory. Where were you from 2008 to 2016?

LOL you believed that. That's sad. I had given you more credit.

 

[Septic]

LOL you believed that. That's sad. I had given you more credit.

I though it odd, but had rarely paid much attention to you or your beliefs. I see now that its been the right call.

 

[Septic]

I was merely pointing out the hypocrisy of the matter. But let's not consider Byrd as being some icon of civil rights either as he's portrayed in some circles. He was far from it but the (D) behind his name gave him a pass on a lot of things.

The NAACP does consider him an 'icon' , it's not for us to decide if he's redeemed himself. They however, did.

 

[DC_Vol]

I though it odd, but had rarely paid much attention to you or your beliefs. I see now that its been the right call.

I've paid attention to your supposed troll jobs.

Not impressed.

 

[Septic]

I've paid attention to your supposed troll jobs.

Not impressed.

And yet here you are, gut hooked.

 

[DC_Vol]

And yet here you are, gut hooked.

:yawn:

 

[Grand Vol]

The NAACP does consider him an 'icon' , it's not for us to decide if he's redeemed himself. They however, did.

I'm curious how they could come to such a conclusion with a man that voted AGAINST the Civil Rights Act of 1964, voted AGAINST the first black SCOTUS nominee (Thurgood Marshall) as well as Clarence Thomas (political with that one, I might assume) and opposed MLK Jr's Poor People's March in Washington.

I'm not even sure I can comprehend how a group dedicated to the advancement of colored people could every give him such an honor based on some of the things he did.

 

[Grand Vol]

And Septic, you know I'm not going to fall into a troll-trap of yours nor will I accept a "because they did, don't question it" answer either. You and I both know the whole icon was questionable at best.

 

[Septic]

I'm curious how they could come to such a conclusion with a man that voted AGAINST the Civil Rights Act of 1964, voted AGAINST the first black SCOTUS nominee (Thurgood Marshall) as well as Clarence Thomas (political with that one, I might assume) and opposed MLK Jr's Poor People's March in Washington.

I'm not even sure I can comprehend how a group dedicated to the advancement of colored people could every give him such an honor based on some of the things he did.

Because he improved on the Act and then set off on five decades of supporting it. I'm no expert on the NAACP but I feel good about them not being in the business of giving props to the White devil that held them down.

 

[Septic]

And Septic, you know I'm not going to fall into a troll-trap of yours nor will I accept a "because they did, don't question it" answer either. You and I both know the whole icon was questionable at best.

I don't know what you're talking about.

 

[Grand Vol]

I don't know what you're talking about.

lol

You can be reasonable from time to time...

Okay, like once a year.

 

[Carl Pickens]

Trump, gets you in a tizzy and that is FANTASTIC!!

.

 

[evillawyer]

12 audio tapes turned over to prosecutors that Trump's team decided not to assert privilege over.

 

[evillawyer]

Cohen's new attorney saying Trump and Giuliani are leaking info about the tapes

Twitter