The source of the Cohen tape info

[newarkvol]

Do you know what stool is? Are you familiar with that term septic? Do you know what a septic tank is?

Yes...Yes...Yes...Again who speaks like that?

Got a question for you....
From your post in Amateur Hour: "I'm a Democrat...extreme democrat. You could even classify me as a socialist on many positions. But as soon as Obama was elected I left the party."
I thought Obama was a socialist?--especially on this forum. Do you know what a socialist is?
Here ya go..
Political spectrum - Wikipedia

 

[Squints]

Aside from your third failed try at supporting a stupid proposition, nothing has changed.

Are you giving up on the defense that you know and have evidence of what a third of all American's believe?

Honestly, I pegged you as someone who had the sense to stop when reaching the bottom. Clearly, I was wrong in this regard. You came in hard with what you thought was a zinger and it fell flat, it happens 'bruh'. Keep thumping your chest and claiming victory though, I think that's what amuses me the most.

WTF are you even talking about? People believing “memes” affected an election somehow gives it roots and justification?

The joke is more so on the people who believe that **** than those of us who don’t. That’s the theme you should be taking away, not whether a meme is “real” or not. IDGAS what memes are “real” or fake, I care about LMAO at fools who believe a Macedonian meme farm orchestrated an overthrow of our election process with pictures and words!!!!

 

[Septic]

Do you know what stool is? Are you familiar with that term septic? Do you know what a septic tank is?

I believe he was making reference to the fact that Squint holds himself out to be a well educated, deep thinking wordsmith. That being ironic due to the need to use name calling as an argumental crutch.

 

[Septic]

WTF are you even talking about? People believing “memes” affected an election somehow gives it roots and justification?

The joke is more so on the people who believe that **** than those of us who don’t. That’s the theme you should be taking away, not whether a meme is “real” or not. IDGAS what memes are “real” or fake, I care about LMAO at fools who believe a Macedonian meme farm orchestrated an overthrow of our election process with pictures and words!!!!

You could have just said you were wrong and didn't realize I'd call you out for your use of generalizations.

Also, calm down - this post makes even less sense than your previous ones.

 

[newarkvol]

You’re a noob, so I wouldn’t expect you to understand.

I’m an engineer by education and practice (re: math), but I also have an affinity for grammar as well. I just overlook it more than most and have no desire to point out every single grammatical mistake, as it would turn into an arduous, perpetual theme.

Usually, most people fall on one side of the spectrum, not both. As for you, you’re not even on the binary paradigm.

Whoa! didn't need the whole CV. I can see Ms. and Mr. Squints are very proud.-- Another matter, and to be more precise--did you mean binary opposition? and what does noob mean in this context? that I am inexperienced with right wing message board protocol?

 

[DC_Vol]

I believe he was making reference to the fact that Squint holds himself out to be a well educated, deep thinking wordsmith. That being ironic due to the need to use name calling as an argumental crutch.

I'm educated and call people names here all the time. The two aren't mutually exclusive. And all in good fun.

I wonder if Squints noticed that argumental is not a word.

 

[DC_Vol]

Yes...Yes...Yes...Again who speaks like that?

Got a question for you....
From your post in Amateur Hour: "I'm a Democrat...extreme democrat. You could even classify me as a socialist on many positions. But as soon as Obama was elected I left the party."
I thought Obama was a socialist?--especially on this forum. Do you know what a socialist is?
Here ya go..
Political spectrum - Wikipedia

What are you getting at Newark? I don't understand your rambling. Your thinking is likely being clouded by the Newark air.

Why are you showing me the definition of socialist given you are the one who seems to think Obama was a socialist? I don't understand. Who are you trying to convince?

 

[Septic]

I'm educated and call people names here all the time. The two aren't mutually exclusive. And all in good fun.

I wonder if Squints noticed that argumental is not a word.

I wonder if he'll agree with you or point out that you started a sentence with a conjunction.

 

[DC_Vol]

I wonder if he'll agree with you or point out that you started a sentence with a conjunction.

I stand corrected. :hi:

 

[newarkvol]

What are you getting at Newark? I don't understand your rambling. Your thinking is likely being clouded by the Newark air.

Why are you showing me the definition of socialist given you are the one who seems to think Obama was a socialist? I don't understand. Who are you trying to convince?

You don't understand? I can see that... oh my. I gotta type real slow..
Again, in the Amateur Hour thread you stated,

"I'm a Democrat...extreme democrat. You could even classify me as a socialist on many positions. But as soon as Obama was elected I left the party."

I did not state obama was a socialist, however many on this board have stated this fairly often.
(as well as a muslim, atheist, homosexual, etc).
---never needs to be explained, justified, or defended, it’s become an agreed-upon thing on in these circles, an ‘everybody knows’ shibboleth.

BUUUT,---I was wondering about this part of your ponderous and incongruous post: "But as soon as Obama was elected I left the party..." so yes I am confused...

Ahhhhh f*** it....communicating on this board is analogous to watching amonkey F*** a football..

 

[DC_Vol]

You don't understand? I can see that... oh my. I gotta type real slow..
Again, in the Amateur Hour thread you stated,

"I'm a Democrat...extreme democrat. You could even classify me as a socialist on many positions. But as soon as Obama was elected I left the party."

I did not state obama was a socialist, however many on this board have stated this fairly often.
(as well as a muslim, atheist, homosexual, etc).
---never needs to be explained, justified, or defended, it’s become an agreed-upon thing on in these circles, an ‘everybody knows’ shibboleth.

BUUUT,---I was wondering about this part of your ponderous and incongruous post: "But as soon as Obama was elected I left the party..." so yes I am confused...

Ahhhhh f*** it....communicating on this board is like witnessing a monkey F*** a football..

I'm trying to understand what question you are asking, numb nuts.

Are you asking me to be spokesperson for the board?

Are you asking me what a socialist is?

Are you asking my opinion on where Obama falls in the political spectrum?

Your "question" was more of a jumbled mish mash of word vomit.

Can you restate your question clearly? Yes, type it slow, if that helps. Thanks!!!

 

[Squints]

You could have just said you were wrong and didn't realize I'd call you out for your use of generalizations.

Also, calm down - this post makes even less sense than your previous ones.

I wasn’t wrong.

You’re going to die on the hill of - millions of votes were lost due to strategically placed memes?

ETA: If so, prove it!

That’s the problem with you, Sep, you have the proclivity to take someone’s argument, wad it up to fit your agenda, and spit it out as though your point reigns supreme. It doesn’t.

I’ve been down this road with you multiple times, and I appreciate the banter we sling, but you’re once again wrong.

Your skill set is better suited for trolling, or at least riling less experienced posters.

 

[newarkvol]

I'm trying to understand what question you are asking, numb nuts.

Are you asking me to be spokesperson for the board?

Are you asking me what a socialist is?

Are you asking my opinion on where Obama falls in the political spectrum?

Your "question" was more of a jumbled mish mash of word vomit.

Can you restate your question clearly? Yes, type it slow, if that helps. Thanks!!!

I didn't ask you anything... just hoped that you might be able to clarify the post you made at

4:06 pm in Amateur Hour
"I'm a Democrat...extreme democrat. You could even classify me as a socialist on many positions. But as soon as Obama was elected I left the party."
--This is your quote--

If you are unable to clarify that is perfectly ok--I do not wish to tax your noggin.

So...1)clarify the statement above -if possible - and then 2)maybe we can tackle this one ---also in the referenced thread:

"I happily admit the first I heard of Max Boot was from this thread. But from reading his own word, I can tell you he's not a conservative.

So you just read a couple of articles and a book or two by Mr. Boot in a couple minutes---because otherwise your statement makes no sense. You might be a fast reader, but for some reason I'm thinking not--

So..in summary if you could clarify those statements that's great...if not ...no worries

 

[Septic]

I wasn’t wrong.

You’re going to die on the hill of - millions of votes were lost due to strategically placed memes?

ETA: If so, prove it!

That’s the problem with you, Sep, you have the proclivity to take someone’s argument, wad it up to fit your agenda, and spit it out as though your point reigns supreme. It doesn’t.

I’ve been down this road with you multiple times, and I appreciate the banter we sling, but you’re once again wrong.

Your skill set is better suited for trolling, or at least riling less experienced posters.

Is this where you pretend to become a victim to my "agenda"?

Listen, 'Mr. Experienced' choose your words a little more carefully and you'll be less inclined to get called on your nonsense.

You made the generalazation, own it.

 

[FLVOL_79]

"Lol. Nice try, stool tank." ??

Are you also on the spectrum? Who told you that? Who speaks like this?

Whoa. Bruh! Where is your tolerance? You seem so full of hate..:ermm:

 

[DC_Vol]

I didn't ask you anything... just hoped that you might be able to clarify the post you made at

[B]4:06 pm in Amateur Hour
"I'm a Democrat...extreme democrat. You could even classify me as a socialist on many positions. But as soon as Obama was elected I left the party."[/B]
--This is your quote--

If you are unable to clarify that is perfectly ok--I do not wish to tax your noggin.

So...1)clarify the statement above -if possible - and then 2)maybe we can tackle this one ---also in the referenced thread:

"I happily admit the first I heard of Max Boot was from this thread. But from reading his own word, I can tell you he's not a conservative.

So you just read a couple of articles and a book or two by Mr. Boot in a couple minutes---because otherwise your statement makes no sense. You might be a fast reader, but for some reason I'm thinking not--

So..in summary if you could clarify those statements that's great...if not ...no worries

Soooo....you are asking me to clarify. That was much easier to understand since you left out the other nonsense. Perhaps it's because you said you were going to type slower.

The first quotation was a parody. I've never been a Democrat and certainly never entertained any ideas of a socialist utopia. Hint: parody related to questions below.

Conservatives don't tear up at an Obama defense of liberal ideals. Nor do they claim the party is primarily white nationalists. That's all I needed to read.

If my memory serves me correctly, I quoted the first part in my reasoning. I didn't bother with the second.

 

[Squints]

Is this where you pretend to become a victim to my "agenda"?

Listen, 'Mr. Experienced' choose your words a little more carefully and you'll be less inclined to get called on your nonsense.

You made the generalazation, own it.

Generalazation? Seriously? LMAO!!!!

Did you mean - generalization*?

There’s nothing for me to own. The left, not the right, has made the argument of concern. Now, if you can show that “the left” (in context to my original post) is inclusive of ALL leftists, let’s see it. If not, it’s just you attempting to do what you do best - contort and fish for likes.

You used to be better at this.

 

[newarkvol]

Whoa. Bruh! Where is your tolerance? You seem so full of hate..:ermm:

No not in the least...I'm not on the board much, but somehow I know that squints is an engineer and is also proficient in mathematics. How do I know this?--because he mentions this factoid ad infinitum and often as a non-sequitur. Oh and he seems to be one of the more hateful members of this board.

 

[Septic]

Generalazation? Seriously? LMAO!!!!

Did you mean - generalization*?

There’s nothing for me to own. The left, not the right, has made the argument of concern. Now, if you can show that “the left” is inclusive of ALL leftists, let’s see it. If not, it’s just you attempting to do what you do best - contort and fish for likes.

You used to be better at this.

Typos on mobiles happen, I've never claimed to be the grammar nazi, that's your thing. It's hilarious watching you try and save face and constantly floundering. Keep dancing for me..

I'd say that you're better than this but you aren't, you've failed tremendously here.

 

[Squints]

No not in the least...I'm not on the board much, but somehow I know that squints is an engineer and is also proficient in mathematics. How do I know this?--because he mentions this factoid ad infinitum and often as a non-sequitur.

You’re one sad, androgynous soy boy.

My comment was contextually related to Septic’s spinning, but, please, spin the argument to hide your envy.

 

[newarkvol]

Soooo....you are asking me to clarify. That was much easier to understand since you left out the other nonsense. Perhaps it's because you said you were going to type slower.

The first quotation was a parody. I've never been a Democrat and certainly never entertained any ideas of a socialist utopia. Hint: parody related to questions below.

Conservatives don't tear up at an Obama defense of liberal ideals. Nor do they claim the party is primarily white nationalists. That's all I needed to read.

If my memory serves me correctly, I quoted the first part in my reasoning. I didn't bother with the second.

okay...what conservative scholars do you read? Just curious

 

[DC_Vol]

okay...what conservative scholars do you read? Just curious

I pretty much stick with trump tweets and squints. They're my solid go tos.

 

[Squints]

Typos on mobiles happen, I've never claimed to be the grammar nazi, that's your thing. It's hilarious watching you try and save face and constantly floundering. Keep dancing for me..

I'd say that you're better than this but you aren't, you've failed tremendously here.

Keep dancing, huh? Another useless argument, which you use often, that’s on par with “moving the goal post.”

You have yet to address my original post, only parsing words to justify to yourself what someone said.

Show the board where, CONTEXTUALLY, “the left” is inclusive of all leftists, with regards to the original argument.

You’ve yet to do it, so.......

Looks like you’re the one dancing, only you’ve been left with your drawers around your ankles, with everyone pointing and laughing at what you’re packing - NOTHING.

 

[newarkvol]

You’re one sad, androgynous soy boy.

My comment was contextually related to Septic’s spinning, but, please, spin the argument to hide your envy.

Is this where I'm supposed to call you a triggered snowflake...or noob or whatever...Nope, I'm tired of playing my part in this charade--endless and mindless--and won't change a thing..Danced in this ****hole far too long today...apologies for any intemperate comments. Go Vols:hi:

 

[Septic]

Keep dancing, huh? Another useless argument, which you use often, that’s on par with “moving the goal post.”

You have yet to address my original post, only parsing words to justify to yourself what someone said.

Show the board where, CONTEXTUALLY, “the left” is inclusive of all leftists, with regards to the original argument.

You’ve yet to do it, so.......

Looks like you’re the one dancing, only you’ve been left with your drawers around your ankles, with everyone pointing and laughing at what you’re packing - NOTHING.

Your post with or without context does nothing to alleviate that you attributed a personal belief, without evidence, to a third of all American's.

This is the crux of the argument and specifically why you keep failing. You, not I, need address your hasty generalization and just own it. I'm a bit amazed that after a half dozen failed attempts you'd circle back around to your own words. Breathtaking stupidity. I don't feel like you tried all of the other available options. Was "Obama's fault" on loan and unavailable? That one's a staple when all else fails...

Lastly, was that parting shot an attempt at a penis size roast? Is that what you've been reduced to? Embarrassingly terrible execution. I can't decide if I should pity you or keep dragging your terrible argument through the mud.

Luckily, your inability to accept your mistake will make that determination for you.