She was one of the murderers. Her entry makes it pretty clear that she wasn't disturbed by it or dealing with remorse. She had fun.
Your take on that cryptic diary entry exemplifies perfectly the flawed nature of jury trials and how easy it is for someone to be wrongfully convicted.
All you need do is register to vote and you are considered qualified enough to potentially decide someone's fate in our judicial system.
How would you fix it then?
I doubt she was convicted on the a single piece of evidence.
You're probably right.. but unless Im missing something. It looked like Dave was basing his opinion on that one little diary entry.
BTW, I am not passing any judgment on this case here.. I am simply pointing about the fallacy of jury trials in general
You're probably right.. but unless Im missing something. It looked like Dave was basing his opinion on that one little diary entry.
BTW, I am not passing any judgment on this case here.. I am simply pointing about the fallacy of jury trials in general