I actually started watching film for starters.
Let's talk about that. You've posted links to videos of whistle-to-whistle cut-ups of certain players. I would consider that fairly weak film study, especially because you've indicated that you watch a very limited number of games, even in cut-up form.
But aside from that, your take away from watching film or games or whatever raises a lot of questions. Let's take an obvious example:
Following the Georgia Tech game, you pointed out that UT had a bad scheme in place to defend the triple option. I don't think anyone would argue against that. However, you also said this:
I loved the athleticism and pursuit I saw on the field. I loved the fact the coaches have made Micah Abernathy and Nigel Warrior our starting safeties. I love the fact Daniel Bituli and Darrell Taylor emerged as stars. I love the fact KMac was able to play as many snaps as he did showing how much his conditioning improved. Overall I just loved the way our players looked on defense physically. They looked explosive and in great shape. They are set up for a great year in conference play.
I loved the speed and passion we played with. Guys we flowing to the football extremely well. I also loved how our players physically looked. KMac looked in phenomenal shape. I also loved the conditioning of our guys to play as many snaps as they did.
Overall I saw a lot more positives from the defense MOVING FORWARD than negatives...
...There's nothing a traditional offense can point to from Monday night and say we can attack that (other than Justin Martin). Everything else we struggled with was related solely to the option scheme and has no bearing on the rest of our opponents.
And you said these things after claiming to have rewatched the game. In fact, you said you felt even better about UT's defense after rewatching the game.
Well, as we all know, Week 1 was a harbinger of the things to come in Weeks 2 thru 12. The "athleticism" and "pursuit," the "explosive" players "flowing to the ball" with "speed and passion" eventually produced the worst rushing defense in Tennessee history and one of the worst in the 85 year history of the SEC.
So, if you liked what you saw after the Georgia Tech game, and then saw the exact same thing for the rest of the season, did you like what you saw from one of the worst ever SEC rush defenses? If you didn't like it, then what did you do wrong when studying the film? Have you recognized the flaws in your process? How are you correcting those flaws?
I'm sure you'll say you were just being a fan, because what else can you say? Otherwise your film review is not merely flawed, it's abysmal.