Burger
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 23, 2009
- Messages
- 14,307
- Likes
- 5,279
Means absolutely nothing until we can see if our guys providing "depth" can actually deliver, if they can actually play.
For example, if you looked at our CB situation last year, you'd have felt good about our depth, what with 4 year starter Sutton, junior Moseley who had a ton of experience, senior Malik Foreman, 4 star Justin Martin, 4 star freshman Marquill Osborne, JUCO DJ Henderson, etc.
As it turns out, nobody played worth a damn all season. So in reality, we had virtually no quality depth because nobody could cover anybody. We went to true freshman Baylen Buchanan early because nobody else cover anybody effectively, and of course we saw him struggle/fail as well, he too wasn't ready to play.
So in any way you wanna measure it, we had no depth at cornerback, only players/warm bodies.
I could do the same thing at linebacker, at DT, at DE, at S, at WR, at RB, at QB, at TE. The only position you can feel decently good about in terms of depth is at OL, and ALL those guys, from starters on down, need to seriously raise their level play.
Also, guess I can assume that you realized how utterly ridiculous your statement about losing 20+ starters last year was since you chose not to touch it in your response....good kid.
If we had adequate depth last year, we would of beaten SC and Vandy. Our recruiting numbers do look good. Unlike Clemson, we seem to have a lot of trouble on the player development front.